I’m so glad you published this and as fast as you did. Many MAGA journalists and influencers are falling into the trap of reflexively reacting to the titles and subtitles only. Then, in our day of “can’t slow down to read carefully,” they skim too fast and miss the necessary context or subtleties, which often are completely skewed if only skimming.
I’m so glad you published this and as fast as you did. Many MAGA journalists and influencers are falling into the trap of reflexively reacting to the titles and subtitles only. Then, in our day of “can’t slow down to read carefully,” they skim too fast and miss the necessary context or subtleties, which often are completely skewed if only skimming.
heck, I've seen people actually seem to read it carefully and STILL come out with guns blazing, hating on Bobby! maybe its kind of a good thing, cuz they showing us who they really are? idk, looking for a silver lining I guess
I’m so glad you published this and as fast as you did. Many MAGA journalists and influencers are falling into the trap of reflexively reacting to the titles and subtitles only. Then, in our day of “can’t slow down to read carefully,” they skim too fast and miss the necessary context or subtleties, which often are completely skewed if only skimming.
Hopefully your article will help many.
heck, I've seen people actually seem to read it carefully and STILL come out with guns blazing, hating on Bobby! maybe its kind of a good thing, cuz they showing us who they really are? idk, looking for a silver lining I guess
Of all the groups who should know MSM lies and deceives at every turn, it’s the anti-vaxxers. Or as I prefer to refer to myself, the PRO-researchers.
I'm 'vaccine risk aware'. anti vaxxer is a pharma-sponsored pejorative ;)
Oh I like that one. Gonna use it
'Vaccine skeptic' here.
When asked, I will cite FOIA information re: Pharma's convictions on shortcutting and lying about their products.
or as Jimmy Dore says: research? we used to call it READING.