Discussion about this post

User's avatar
K.Lib4's avatar

I’ve been encouraged lately that my 23 yo daughter (who is definitely a product of her generation) has been on this rabid kick to preserve physical media. She buys books and CD’s and DVD’s. In her car, she listens to an album as it was meant to be listened to. She and her sisters read whole books OUT LOUD to each other. I may have screwed up as a mom 1000 ways, but this makes me very proud.

Expand full comment
Copernicus's avatar

I can barely get through this insanity.

Saying that tech is cleaner for the planet than cardboard and paper (both of which come from *trees* and return to *dirt*) is as dumb as claiming that electric-powered cars in the Midwest (where the electricity comes from... coal) are better for the environment than gas cars. What about the environmental costs of harvesting all those rare earth metals for the processors in the VR? Not to mention the human costs, a la Ukraine and places like it.

Besides, virtual dumbbells are not going to shape our biceps. Virtual tree climbing is not going to build the neural networks necessary for balance and strength and assessing risk. A virtual dog or spouse is not going to elicit the same tactile-snuggle-beside-me sensations and hormonal responses that a real, live, warm one will.

Garbage. All of it.

Reminds me of the gizmo Jeff Childers described recently ... a pocket-sized thingy that will purport to know us better than we know ourselves as it continuously assesses our every action and word.

We must walk wisely, not as fools.

Expand full comment
182 more comments...

No posts