Correct, you did not say anything about a factual ruling per se. I didn't mean to put words in your mouth. My apologies.
But some of what is alleged by all the press releases and commentaries is that the Court made some final determination that the vaccine isn't a vaccine, or similar, and they simply did not say that. They only said, in e…
Correct, you did not say anything about a factual ruling per se. I didn't mean to put words in your mouth. My apologies.
But some of what is alleged by all the press releases and commentaries is that the Court made some final determination that the vaccine isn't a vaccine, or similar, and they simply did not say that. They only said, in essence, that this factual issue should have its day in Court.
And I like you would normally rely on HFDF, David Martin and RFK, Jr. Don't blame you at all. But they aren't getting this story right, and they should know better.
Fair enough. Maybe we're ALL (not you; I mean, myself and the group you mentioned) guilty of wishful thinking? Appreciate the nuance and you taking the time to share. :)
Correct, you did not say anything about a factual ruling per se. I didn't mean to put words in your mouth. My apologies.
But some of what is alleged by all the press releases and commentaries is that the Court made some final determination that the vaccine isn't a vaccine, or similar, and they simply did not say that. They only said, in essence, that this factual issue should have its day in Court.
And I like you would normally rely on HFDF, David Martin and RFK, Jr. Don't blame you at all. But they aren't getting this story right, and they should know better.
Fair enough. Maybe we're ALL (not you; I mean, myself and the group you mentioned) guilty of wishful thinking? Appreciate the nuance and you taking the time to share. :)