The only solution is to get two authors to write one pro, one con, then run their articles side by side.
Let the reader, after being exposed to both sides of the issue and being appraised of the actual facts, make their own individual judgment.
Ignoring half of the facts while reporting only those facts that fit your narrative is the whole problem.
With actual links included.
undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)
Skip for now
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
The only solution is to get two authors to write one pro, one con, then run their articles side by side.
Let the reader, after being exposed to both sides of the issue and being appraised of the actual facts, make their own individual judgment.
Ignoring half of the facts while reporting only those facts that fit your narrative is the whole problem.
With actual links included.