You’re wrong about this. One of the videos in slow motion captures images of Trump BEFORE he ducks down right after his ear is hit and he notices it, then his had comes back down from his ear and he looks at it and it shows blood on it right then and there. The blood came from a bullet. He did NOT stage this. It’s a ridiculous assertion …
You’re wrong about this. One of the videos in slow motion captures images of Trump BEFORE he ducks down right after his ear is hit and he notices it, then his had comes back down from his ear and he looks at it and it shows blood on it right then and there. The blood came from a bullet. He did NOT stage this. It’s a ridiculous assertion because, 1) he didn’t need this kind of push. He wasn’t desperate! The left IS desperate AND has the kind of character that would do whatever they could to win. So they project that suspicion onto Trump because that’s what THEY would do in his shoes!! But that is NOT what we would do and Trump is We! He wouldn’t use that tactic to win. He had the advantage to not have to! He just has to sit tight and hold his tongue, letting them keep making mistakes that propels him even further in the race. 2) He would never risk any slight chance with wind, mistakes, minor interferences that could cause him to actually get shot in a way that took his life. You cannot control something like that. It’s easier to kill someone than it is to shoot around them from that distance and not kill them. 3) And his son was there and he wouldn’t put him in danger either, or risk him having to watch his father get killed. 4) He would NEVER put the lives of his loving supporters on the line either! OMG, never. You don’t know anything real about this man if you think he would.
Trump does not still push the death jabs. I wish he would speak to his mistakes but I get that it is political, and he may have to wait to say all that he wishes to after he wins the election. I refuse to hold him accountable for what progressed in 2021 and beyond when he wasn’t there!! You don’t get to make assumptions and certainties about what he would have done based on 2020. We ALL were lied to and duped by the very same people guiding him. I do believe that like me, probably sooner, he would have started to connect the dots and been against the shots earlier in 2021. I do feel he would have handled it all differently than Biden did and he never would have mandated it.
His VP changed his views too. I don’t judge him by things he said 4-6 years ago. I like a candidate that openly announces when they have been wrong as he did, and as RFKJr has done many times too, admitting that now that they know more today they must take a different direction and then they do. THAT is the mark of good leadership.
If JD announced his changed heart for Trump just three months ago maybe it would be more self-serving career b.s. But he changed his attitude towards Trump 4-5 years ago! Heck even if it were just 3 years ago it’s still way before the elections abd VP was never on his radar back then. And he is NOT trail blazing a path to a technocratic social credit score like China either. This is all b.s. sensationalized MSM narratives about them. Maybe you should listen to some of JD’s more recent interviews from the past year.
Please provide a link to the video(s) where you can see the blood on his hand right after he touches his ear.
If he doesn't continue to push the death jabs, then please provide evidence of when he has stopped supporting the death jabs.
His VP is a protege of Peter Thiel. If you don't know who Peter Thiel is and how he is connected to the deep state, then I highly recommend doing some research.
Since when does the MSM sensationalize the idea that we are heading towards a technocratic state controlled by a social credit score system like China?
Well this is the best example of how you didn’t do your own research well enough before parroting false information about Vance. That makes me think you WANT people to doubt him or hate him because it’s a pretty divisive subject.
While he did make a comment about firing nurses, it was said in a completely sarcastic way, ending with something like “yeah that’ll help”. He was being sarcastic because of how foolish people were being and he was always against mandates. Sort of like “right sure, mandates will help” (insert big eye roll) or “sure let’s fire all the unvaccinated nurses. That’ll help” (insert eye roll). But as always the left will grab things out of context to twist and gamble the average reader won’t check their claims. To know for certain if someone meant something seriously or sarcastically you have to look at it in collection with all his other public comments about it, and Vance is clearly against mandates:
Vance wrote a guest column for The Columbus Dispatch in August 2021 admonishing Ohio State University for its vaccine mandate:
@We're all members of The Ohio State University community--either as alumni, students, or parents--and we're outraged that Ohio State will impose a vaccine mandate on its students. This is a mistake, an invasion of medical privacy, and a complete bait-and-switch, and we urge the university to reconsider. … Some of us have received the vaccine and others haven't; some of us have encouraged friends and relatives in high risk categories to receive it. But the decision to not get vaccinated is often rooted in caution about long-term risks, not a rejection of science or the severity of COVID. That caution must be allowed in a free society, not stamped out through mandates.”
Then Forbes Breaking posted a clip from a Facebook Live event that Vance hosted on YouTube in October 2021, in which he again voiced his opinion that "we should not be requiring people to take the vaccine." and “We live in a country where informed citizens get the right to make decisions for themselves and their personal lives and their government lives and when we should be trusting people enough to reason with them to level with them to make arguments and let them make a decision about what they want to do with these vaccines.”
So, these state MUCH more clearly his stance on vaccine mandates, and in light of knowing these statement you can then see how he was being exasperatingly sarcastic with that one tweet. Only those who don’t follow him or look more into him would wrongly assume he meant it literally.
I know who Peter Thiel is and what things about him are concerning. But that is Thiel, not JD. Why are we judging him based on a past association when he was a lot younger just starting out and not possessing all the necessary experience to avoid certain associations or even recognize how they could be problematic to him? He was just starting to learn. It also doesn’t mean JD is or was completely in line with everything about Thiel. It’s almost impossible in business not to have been involved at some point in our lives with someone who holds concerning views and goals. But that was also many years ago. And JD is still very young in respect to others in government. He might not have known a lot of things about Thiel at that time, but having worked with him in his past sure makes for a great, quick discrediting headline doesn’t it? What specifically do YOU know about JD’s present day stances, actions, and character that are attributable to Thiel? I’d be truly interested in knowing.
(Thank God my character is not held over the same kind of coals for people I was involved with when I was younger. OMG I made mistakes in my judgement! Aren’t we allowed to grow?) What matters most is who he is today.
As for the videos, I need to stop today’s political addiction and make my family dinner (who are waiting on me with bated breath as I quickly type this, and I feel silly telling them this thread is more important than them,) and then I need to get caught up on some very large piles of laundry before a busy day tomorrow. I really don’t have the time right now to go grab all the many links of videos and images and articles I have viewed over the past three days. It’s a LOT. I also am not like you in that I never feel a need to catalogue every source of my opinions because I don’t have any agendas to sway a large portion of public opinion one way or the other. I never stop to think I might need to plop down a host of links to further a narrative. I’m also not a journalist. However I WILL pipe up when I feel confident someone is wrong and I feel there’s an ocean of information out there easily available to all of us that can show where my logic stems from. But grabbing the links myself will take time. I will try to do that tomorrow morning and come back here to post. Many were actually shared in Substacks here! It’s crazy how much there is. You can peruse who I read and probably discover a lot of them on your own.
I appreciate the tactic of asking people for their sources. It’s necessary, most especially when we all know someone is lying and we know there is NOTHING out there that backs up their claims, so we ask for them to share what we may have missed. It’s reasonable and necessary. But in this situation there is no shortage of footage that shows the opposite of what your links show. You can find them all in the same amount of time it will take me - it’s not hard to find but … it won’t be quick. So why make me do all the work for you? You just need to look at more than you already have, (if you haven’t already cherry-picked…) I actually saw ALL of your links myself before, along with everything else out there, and in considering all of it I came to a different conclusion than you. I don’t think either of us can claim certainty, but we sure sound like it because we have both given a lot of thought to it. I also take into account certain personal things about Trump that don’t fit your theory. Still I think it’s sort of like a Rorschach Test at first, isn’t it? But … eventually an image appears more clearly than others and possibly we are just caught in the middle of “I see the old lady” and “you see the young girl” in the optical illusion? 🤷🏼♀️
But like I said, I will try to find it all and come back tomorrow with a reply. I just need a lot of time to find three days worth of videos and stories. I’ll do my best if I can make the time between now and then.
JD openly called for firing thousands of nurses for not getting the death jabs. That was just a couple of years ago. What makes you think he has changed? I haven't seen him issue an apology. Have you?
I am looking forward to the links that you will be providing.
In the mean time, please consider that this whole left/right paradigm is a false dichotomy. There's the ruling class and then there is us. This whole going back and forth thing between the reds and the blues is a distraction from what is really going on. Both sides are manipulated and controlled by individuals that do not care about the US.
“Politics is the entertainment division of the military industrial complex.”
― Frank Zappa
George Carlin said it best. "They don't care about you." Ain't that the truth.
Ok here are two thought provoking photos. One is the image I told you about taken by slowing down frames of a video of right when he was shot. If you zoom in on the last picture of the three you can see blood on his hand. It’s right there. No time for him to create that injury himself. Let me know if you can’t access it. Im not as versed in where to upload images to share these days. I tried ibb.co this time.
The second one I just happened to save the link because it shows how the SLIGHTEST move is life or death and why NO ONE would stage their own assassination in this way.
I am running out of time this morning and cannot dig up the fantastic videos of the other more believable sniper experts that I watched explaining why this was definitely an attempt on his life if not simply unprecedented suspicious incompetence. They are in substacks that I read and I ask you to try to find them yourself in the meantime. I will say I think our minds are noticing a LOT of the same things and believing that things don’t add up, because they don’t. We are on the same page there. But I wholeheartedly believe from all the info and all the different reporting angles I have seen that there is far less logical evidence/reasoning supporting Trump being behind it than there is showing somebody else is.
I have yet to get to the most recent news this morning but saw that C&C is reporting they now suspect a third shooter. That would not surprise me with all the footage and images I have seen with line of sight line ups to the podium and bleachers.
Thank you for providing those links. Those pictures are highly suspicious given the fact that they were taken by the same photographer that took the infamous pictures of Bush being told that the planes just hit the towers on 9/11. What are the odds of that? Tim Truth recently posted a video on this: https://www.bitchute.com/video/gMviuKQZIb1f
The photos are not actual photos taken by a photographer. They were frames taken from a video that was recorded at the event, slowed down to capture each frame. Was that video recorded by that photographer? Or was the photographer busy snapping pictures while someone else was recording this video?
I just wanted to clarify: The images either have a blue sky background or they have the crowd/stands in the background. Initially on July 14 I was hyper focusing on his hand coming down from his ear and the blood on it. I saw both kinds of images with this evidence. The commentary and slow-down frame captures of the video I was speaking about had the stands/crowd in the background.
But the ones with the blue sky were definitely captured by Mills - he was using a camera that captures about 30 images ~per second~ when he captured those shots. (A camera that fast most definitely can grab a one in a million shot.) Those were not from video screen captures. The ones with the crowd in them were. Both captures show the blood on his hand.
ONE MORE THING I’m discovering that we ALL are falling victim too: When we look at these images showing areal views of the event with lines drawn on them showing bullet trajectories and origination points, as well as the stands and where the injured people were, I’m noticing blatant mistakes depicting where the injured/killed attendees were located and conflicting depictions. Some images show them in a box depicting the stand to the left of the podium if you are standing in front of the podium. (Closest to where the building was that the shooter was on.) Others show that they were actually in the stands to the right of the podium. Well which is it?? That drastically changes which trajectories could have hit them. Depending on your vantage point and your interpretation of “to his left” when speaking of Trump it changes. If you are looking at Trump from the main crowd in the field, or looking at an aerial image of the event where the snipers are near the top of image and the shooter building is to the left, you would say to Trump’s left but it’s actually HIS right. He is facing the crowd. If you’re in the stands looking from behind him, or looking at a rotated aerial, his left is his left and then the stands with those shot are the further stands from the shooter. I have seen both images. Following are a few examples of pictures giving opposing information about where the spectators are that were hit.
These first two depict them being on the left side of Trump if you are facing Trump from the field:
This video shows how the bullet ricochets off the stands railing but also hits someone in that same stand on the left side of it, but it is most definitely the spectator stand that is to the RIGHT of the podium furthest from the buildings the shooter is on, if facing the podium from out in the field. So spectators definitely were hit on the right side stands as this video proves, but most of the diagrams with trajectory lines depict them on the left. Video shows otherwise.
🤣 My point in all this is how next to impossible it is to get clear, factual images because everyone’s interpretation of right or left switches depending on what vantage point they are actually talking about and how they portray that on images they grab and scribble on. It’s causing a lot of confusion and from what is available to all of us nobody can say for certainty anything about bullet trajectories and what they are proving.
I’m exhausted, and I really, really suck at trying to find all these things I’ve seen. I have seen better diagrams even this morning that I remember showing all of this clearly and I can’t for the life of me find them now just hours later in this landfill of info.
FOR REAL this could be your job. Here's something I keep wondering; there were thousands (tens of thousands?) of people there... why have we seen like three "real videos" total? You'd think that shit would be ALL OVER social media, no?
Similar to anything that comes from the mainstream media,I think it's important to consider that anything coming from Mills should be taken with a grain of salt, especially considering the fact that he's always in the right place at the right time. He is basically a government agent due to the amount of clearance he has had to obtain to be able to get so close to these government officials.
Did you get to watch the Tim Truth video? I have seen the video of Bush being whispered to about the planes on 9/11 but I never paid attention to what the teacher was having the kids read out loud until this video points it out. My wife and I were thoroughly disturbed to say the least. Although seemingly not related, I think that this points to the fact that these psychopaths in control have almost everything scripted like a movie.
With that being said, I think this entire event plays out like a movie that's perfectly scripted. Tim Truth does a great job at pointing this out in his initial video about this "assassination attempt." It's not a coincidence that Trump has everyone's attention by having them look to the right at the giant diagram so that his right ear is not visible. It's not a coincidence that there are no videos or pictures that show this side of Trump before or after he grabs his ear and ducks. It's not a coincidence that the SS is clearing out the backstage before the shots. There are so many red flags.
I’ll try to locate it. Took me over 45 minutes to find the slowed down frames in picture form. I know for certain I first saw it from the video and then they slowed it down while discussing it - so it definitely was taken from that video. It is out there somewhere. I’ll see if I can find it. (*note to self for next crisis event: copy every link to every damn article I read or video I see to my notepad 🤣*)
Also another article from The NY Times on July 14 that speaks to the veracity that a camera could actually catch an image of a bullet like that and that Mills indeed was using one such camera that could have. One in a million chance but that doesn’t mean it can’t be possible. I think the expert in the story corroborates the validity of his photos.
Here in this interview Mills explains that the initial jog images that went to the cloud actually showed the blood on his hand abd his assistant called him to tell him, but he had to download the raw images from his camera later to verify. But the initial jog images showed both the bullet and the blood.
This article covers the frame by frame of the video I am speaking of but it does not have as clear of images of each frame as the commentary I first saw. That commentary was either linked to on Substack or I found it on X after being linked there for something else.
Sorry there is sooooo much to sift through and the things I saw three days ago are so deeply buried now that it’s hard to find what I first came across. I’m trying…
This is not the video and commentary I first saw about this where they showed the video in real time then went back to slow it down. But it does show that Mills also caught the same images with his camera. It can help to listen to his interview about it and take it into account. Is it possible the same guy was in the right place twice? Of course it is. Mills is often in the front row at these kinds of events. It’s not like these are the only two images he has ever caught that are so profoundly important. I think it’s a really weak argument to use him being the photographer of catching both as any proof that it was not real. It’s definitely an argument to be had, it’s just weaker in light of all the other surrounding evidence and video and images captured by others as well.
I also would like to say I think convos like this are urgently important especially because of the troves of people out there posting “Trump set this up” and they truly have nothing more than a vested interest of hate. Period. It’s all trying to feed and control the direction of the hysteria. We need concrete data to show the illogical foolishness of their theories and I unfortunately am not the Maverick for rounding all that up at this point in time. I do hope more skilled arm-chair reporters step up and properly line up all the evidence I have seen to shut down these dangerous, inflammatory accusations about him that will only feed a deeper civil divide. Twitter has all the videos and that’s like trying to find needles in a dense underbrush, so I rely on Substack to point me and I think they are doing a fabulous job.
You’re wrong about this. One of the videos in slow motion captures images of Trump BEFORE he ducks down right after his ear is hit and he notices it, then his had comes back down from his ear and he looks at it and it shows blood on it right then and there. The blood came from a bullet. He did NOT stage this. It’s a ridiculous assertion because, 1) he didn’t need this kind of push. He wasn’t desperate! The left IS desperate AND has the kind of character that would do whatever they could to win. So they project that suspicion onto Trump because that’s what THEY would do in his shoes!! But that is NOT what we would do and Trump is We! He wouldn’t use that tactic to win. He had the advantage to not have to! He just has to sit tight and hold his tongue, letting them keep making mistakes that propels him even further in the race. 2) He would never risk any slight chance with wind, mistakes, minor interferences that could cause him to actually get shot in a way that took his life. You cannot control something like that. It’s easier to kill someone than it is to shoot around them from that distance and not kill them. 3) And his son was there and he wouldn’t put him in danger either, or risk him having to watch his father get killed. 4) He would NEVER put the lives of his loving supporters on the line either! OMG, never. You don’t know anything real about this man if you think he would.
Trump does not still push the death jabs. I wish he would speak to his mistakes but I get that it is political, and he may have to wait to say all that he wishes to after he wins the election. I refuse to hold him accountable for what progressed in 2021 and beyond when he wasn’t there!! You don’t get to make assumptions and certainties about what he would have done based on 2020. We ALL were lied to and duped by the very same people guiding him. I do believe that like me, probably sooner, he would have started to connect the dots and been against the shots earlier in 2021. I do feel he would have handled it all differently than Biden did and he never would have mandated it.
His VP changed his views too. I don’t judge him by things he said 4-6 years ago. I like a candidate that openly announces when they have been wrong as he did, and as RFKJr has done many times too, admitting that now that they know more today they must take a different direction and then they do. THAT is the mark of good leadership.
If JD announced his changed heart for Trump just three months ago maybe it would be more self-serving career b.s. But he changed his attitude towards Trump 4-5 years ago! Heck even if it were just 3 years ago it’s still way before the elections abd VP was never on his radar back then. And he is NOT trail blazing a path to a technocratic social credit score like China either. This is all b.s. sensationalized MSM narratives about them. Maybe you should listen to some of JD’s more recent interviews from the past year.
Please provide a link to the video(s) where you can see the blood on his hand right after he touches his ear.
If he doesn't continue to push the death jabs, then please provide evidence of when he has stopped supporting the death jabs.
His VP is a protege of Peter Thiel. If you don't know who Peter Thiel is and how he is connected to the deep state, then I highly recommend doing some research.
Since when does the MSM sensationalize the idea that we are heading towards a technocratic state controlled by a social credit score system like China?
And here is a video for you to hear him for yourself to go along with the quotes I just posted:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=-hW40gYgc5U&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.snopes.com%2F&source_ve_path=MTM5MTE3LDI4NjY2
Thank you for sharing. I was wrong about his stance on this and I'm happy to be proven wrong.
Me too Vee. Me too!
Well this is the best example of how you didn’t do your own research well enough before parroting false information about Vance. That makes me think you WANT people to doubt him or hate him because it’s a pretty divisive subject.
While he did make a comment about firing nurses, it was said in a completely sarcastic way, ending with something like “yeah that’ll help”. He was being sarcastic because of how foolish people were being and he was always against mandates. Sort of like “right sure, mandates will help” (insert big eye roll) or “sure let’s fire all the unvaccinated nurses. That’ll help” (insert eye roll). But as always the left will grab things out of context to twist and gamble the average reader won’t check their claims. To know for certain if someone meant something seriously or sarcastically you have to look at it in collection with all his other public comments about it, and Vance is clearly against mandates:
Vance wrote a guest column for The Columbus Dispatch in August 2021 admonishing Ohio State University for its vaccine mandate:
@We're all members of The Ohio State University community--either as alumni, students, or parents--and we're outraged that Ohio State will impose a vaccine mandate on its students. This is a mistake, an invasion of medical privacy, and a complete bait-and-switch, and we urge the university to reconsider. … Some of us have received the vaccine and others haven't; some of us have encouraged friends and relatives in high risk categories to receive it. But the decision to not get vaccinated is often rooted in caution about long-term risks, not a rejection of science or the severity of COVID. That caution must be allowed in a free society, not stamped out through mandates.”
Then Forbes Breaking posted a clip from a Facebook Live event that Vance hosted on YouTube in October 2021, in which he again voiced his opinion that "we should not be requiring people to take the vaccine." and “We live in a country where informed citizens get the right to make decisions for themselves and their personal lives and their government lives and when we should be trusting people enough to reason with them to level with them to make arguments and let them make a decision about what they want to do with these vaccines.”
So, these state MUCH more clearly his stance on vaccine mandates, and in light of knowing these statement you can then see how he was being exasperatingly sarcastic with that one tweet. Only those who don’t follow him or look more into him would wrongly assume he meant it literally.
Accurate! Thanks for sharing. :)
I know who Peter Thiel is and what things about him are concerning. But that is Thiel, not JD. Why are we judging him based on a past association when he was a lot younger just starting out and not possessing all the necessary experience to avoid certain associations or even recognize how they could be problematic to him? He was just starting to learn. It also doesn’t mean JD is or was completely in line with everything about Thiel. It’s almost impossible in business not to have been involved at some point in our lives with someone who holds concerning views and goals. But that was also many years ago. And JD is still very young in respect to others in government. He might not have known a lot of things about Thiel at that time, but having worked with him in his past sure makes for a great, quick discrediting headline doesn’t it? What specifically do YOU know about JD’s present day stances, actions, and character that are attributable to Thiel? I’d be truly interested in knowing.
(Thank God my character is not held over the same kind of coals for people I was involved with when I was younger. OMG I made mistakes in my judgement! Aren’t we allowed to grow?) What matters most is who he is today.
As for the videos, I need to stop today’s political addiction and make my family dinner (who are waiting on me with bated breath as I quickly type this, and I feel silly telling them this thread is more important than them,) and then I need to get caught up on some very large piles of laundry before a busy day tomorrow. I really don’t have the time right now to go grab all the many links of videos and images and articles I have viewed over the past three days. It’s a LOT. I also am not like you in that I never feel a need to catalogue every source of my opinions because I don’t have any agendas to sway a large portion of public opinion one way or the other. I never stop to think I might need to plop down a host of links to further a narrative. I’m also not a journalist. However I WILL pipe up when I feel confident someone is wrong and I feel there’s an ocean of information out there easily available to all of us that can show where my logic stems from. But grabbing the links myself will take time. I will try to do that tomorrow morning and come back here to post. Many were actually shared in Substacks here! It’s crazy how much there is. You can peruse who I read and probably discover a lot of them on your own.
I appreciate the tactic of asking people for their sources. It’s necessary, most especially when we all know someone is lying and we know there is NOTHING out there that backs up their claims, so we ask for them to share what we may have missed. It’s reasonable and necessary. But in this situation there is no shortage of footage that shows the opposite of what your links show. You can find them all in the same amount of time it will take me - it’s not hard to find but … it won’t be quick. So why make me do all the work for you? You just need to look at more than you already have, (if you haven’t already cherry-picked…) I actually saw ALL of your links myself before, along with everything else out there, and in considering all of it I came to a different conclusion than you. I don’t think either of us can claim certainty, but we sure sound like it because we have both given a lot of thought to it. I also take into account certain personal things about Trump that don’t fit your theory. Still I think it’s sort of like a Rorschach Test at first, isn’t it? But … eventually an image appears more clearly than others and possibly we are just caught in the middle of “I see the old lady” and “you see the young girl” in the optical illusion? 🤷🏼♀️
But like I said, I will try to find it all and come back tomorrow with a reply. I just need a lot of time to find three days worth of videos and stories. I’ll do my best if I can make the time between now and then.
JD openly called for firing thousands of nurses for not getting the death jabs. That was just a couple of years ago. What makes you think he has changed? I haven't seen him issue an apology. Have you?
I am looking forward to the links that you will be providing.
In the mean time, please consider that this whole left/right paradigm is a false dichotomy. There's the ruling class and then there is us. This whole going back and forth thing between the reds and the blues is a distraction from what is really going on. Both sides are manipulated and controlled by individuals that do not care about the US.
“Politics is the entertainment division of the military industrial complex.”
― Frank Zappa
George Carlin said it best. "They don't care about you." Ain't that the truth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aiFp-XqV_M
Juju is right tho; the "fire the nurses" comment was CLEARLY sarcastic. https://uk.news.yahoo.com/fact-check-j-d-vance-204100025.html
I stand corrected. Thank you for the call out. I never thought that I'd be fact checked by Yahoo by way of Jenna McCarthy!
hahaha I looked at three or four sources but that one showed the original tweet so... [shrug/lol]
Lmaoooo 🤣 same here! I couldn’t believe Yahoo actually got something right!
Ok here are two thought provoking photos. One is the image I told you about taken by slowing down frames of a video of right when he was shot. If you zoom in on the last picture of the three you can see blood on his hand. It’s right there. No time for him to create that injury himself. Let me know if you can’t access it. Im not as versed in where to upload images to share these days. I tried ibb.co this time.
https://ibb.co/tB7thZz
The second one I just happened to save the link because it shows how the SLIGHTEST move is life or death and why NO ONE would stage their own assassination in this way.
https://x.com/seanfeucht/status/1813618000517529702?s=46
I am running out of time this morning and cannot dig up the fantastic videos of the other more believable sniper experts that I watched explaining why this was definitely an attempt on his life if not simply unprecedented suspicious incompetence. They are in substacks that I read and I ask you to try to find them yourself in the meantime. I will say I think our minds are noticing a LOT of the same things and believing that things don’t add up, because they don’t. We are on the same page there. But I wholeheartedly believe from all the info and all the different reporting angles I have seen that there is far less logical evidence/reasoning supporting Trump being behind it than there is showing somebody else is.
I have yet to get to the most recent news this morning but saw that C&C is reporting they now suspect a third shooter. That would not surprise me with all the footage and images I have seen with line of sight line ups to the podium and bleachers.
Thank you for providing those links. Those pictures are highly suspicious given the fact that they were taken by the same photographer that took the infamous pictures of Bush being told that the planes just hit the towers on 9/11. What are the odds of that? Tim Truth recently posted a video on this: https://www.bitchute.com/video/gMviuKQZIb1f
The photos are not actual photos taken by a photographer. They were frames taken from a video that was recorded at the event, slowed down to capture each frame. Was that video recorded by that photographer? Or was the photographer busy snapping pictures while someone else was recording this video?
Do you have a link to the video where these frames are pulled from? That would be super helpful.
I just wanted to clarify: The images either have a blue sky background or they have the crowd/stands in the background. Initially on July 14 I was hyper focusing on his hand coming down from his ear and the blood on it. I saw both kinds of images with this evidence. The commentary and slow-down frame captures of the video I was speaking about had the stands/crowd in the background.
But the ones with the blue sky were definitely captured by Mills - he was using a camera that captures about 30 images ~per second~ when he captured those shots. (A camera that fast most definitely can grab a one in a million shot.) Those were not from video screen captures. The ones with the crowd in them were. Both captures show the blood on his hand.
ONE MORE THING I’m discovering that we ALL are falling victim too: When we look at these images showing areal views of the event with lines drawn on them showing bullet trajectories and origination points, as well as the stands and where the injured people were, I’m noticing blatant mistakes depicting where the injured/killed attendees were located and conflicting depictions. Some images show them in a box depicting the stand to the left of the podium if you are standing in front of the podium. (Closest to where the building was that the shooter was on.) Others show that they were actually in the stands to the right of the podium. Well which is it?? That drastically changes which trajectories could have hit them. Depending on your vantage point and your interpretation of “to his left” when speaking of Trump it changes. If you are looking at Trump from the main crowd in the field, or looking at an aerial image of the event where the snipers are near the top of image and the shooter building is to the left, you would say to Trump’s left but it’s actually HIS right. He is facing the crowd. If you’re in the stands looking from behind him, or looking at a rotated aerial, his left is his left and then the stands with those shot are the further stands from the shooter. I have seen both images. Following are a few examples of pictures giving opposing information about where the spectators are that were hit.
These first two depict them being on the left side of Trump if you are facing Trump from the field:
https://ibb.co/TgGnDjQ
https://ibb.co/mz7wnMx
Then this link shows they are on the right!
https://ibb.co/VNS7ywf
This video shows how the bullet ricochets off the stands railing but also hits someone in that same stand on the left side of it, but it is most definitely the spectator stand that is to the RIGHT of the podium furthest from the buildings the shooter is on, if facing the podium from out in the field. So spectators definitely were hit on the right side stands as this video proves, but most of the diagrams with trajectory lines depict them on the left. Video shows otherwise.
https://www.tmz.com/2024/07/17/new-angle-trump-rally-shooting-attendees-stands-under-fire-bullets/
THEN there is THIS image that shows BOTH stands had spectators hit 🤷🏼♀️
https://ibb.co/LSXWRH5
H
🤣 My point in all this is how next to impossible it is to get clear, factual images because everyone’s interpretation of right or left switches depending on what vantage point they are actually talking about and how they portray that on images they grab and scribble on. It’s causing a lot of confusion and from what is available to all of us nobody can say for certainty anything about bullet trajectories and what they are proving.
I’m exhausted, and I really, really suck at trying to find all these things I’ve seen. I have seen better diagrams even this morning that I remember showing all of this clearly and I can’t for the life of me find them now just hours later in this landfill of info.
FOR REAL this could be your job. Here's something I keep wondering; there were thousands (tens of thousands?) of people there... why have we seen like three "real videos" total? You'd think that shit would be ALL OVER social media, no?
Similar to anything that comes from the mainstream media,I think it's important to consider that anything coming from Mills should be taken with a grain of salt, especially considering the fact that he's always in the right place at the right time. He is basically a government agent due to the amount of clearance he has had to obtain to be able to get so close to these government officials.
Did you get to watch the Tim Truth video? I have seen the video of Bush being whispered to about the planes on 9/11 but I never paid attention to what the teacher was having the kids read out loud until this video points it out. My wife and I were thoroughly disturbed to say the least. Although seemingly not related, I think that this points to the fact that these psychopaths in control have almost everything scripted like a movie.
With that being said, I think this entire event plays out like a movie that's perfectly scripted. Tim Truth does a great job at pointing this out in his initial video about this "assassination attempt." It's not a coincidence that Trump has everyone's attention by having them look to the right at the giant diagram so that his right ear is not visible. It's not a coincidence that there are no videos or pictures that show this side of Trump before or after he grabs his ear and ducks. It's not a coincidence that the SS is clearing out the backstage before the shots. There are so many red flags.
I’ll try to locate it. Took me over 45 minutes to find the slowed down frames in picture form. I know for certain I first saw it from the video and then they slowed it down while discussing it - so it definitely was taken from that video. It is out there somewhere. I’ll see if I can find it. (*note to self for next crisis event: copy every link to every damn article I read or video I see to my notepad 🤣*)
Hahahaha if I need a researcher, YOU'RE HIRED!
Lmao I feel like I really suck at it though 🤣
Also another article from The NY Times on July 14 that speaks to the veracity that a camera could actually catch an image of a bullet like that and that Mills indeed was using one such camera that could have. One in a million chance but that doesn’t mean it can’t be possible. I think the expert in the story corroborates the validity of his photos.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/14/us/politics/photo-path-trump-assassination.html
And I found a clearer image of the screen capture of that frame showing blood on his hand here:
https://www.reuters.com/pictures/frame-by-frame-trump-survives-assassination-attempt-2024-07-14/
https://ibb.co/vm37dnb
Here in this interview Mills explains that the initial jog images that went to the cloud actually showed the blood on his hand abd his assistant called him to tell him, but he had to download the raw images from his camera later to verify. But the initial jog images showed both the bullet and the blood.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/photographer-on-capturing-bullet-during-trump-rally-assassination-attempt/ar-BB1q1w4U
Jpg not jog. Sorry for my phone autocorrupt
This article covers the frame by frame of the video I am speaking of but it does not have as clear of images of each frame as the commentary I first saw. That commentary was either linked to on Substack or I found it on X after being linked there for something else.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/frame-frame-video-trump-pennsylvania-040408060.html
There is blood on his hand when he pulled it away from his ear but it’s blurry in the picture in this article. Still you can sort of see it.
Sorry there is sooooo much to sift through and the things I saw three days ago are so deeply buried now that it’s hard to find what I first came across. I’m trying…
This is not the video and commentary I first saw about this where they showed the video in real time then went back to slow it down. But it does show that Mills also caught the same images with his camera. It can help to listen to his interview about it and take it into account. Is it possible the same guy was in the right place twice? Of course it is. Mills is often in the front row at these kinds of events. It’s not like these are the only two images he has ever caught that are so profoundly important. I think it’s a really weak argument to use him being the photographer of catching both as any proof that it was not real. It’s definitely an argument to be had, it’s just weaker in light of all the other surrounding evidence and video and images captured by others as well.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/14/politics/video/doug-mills-trump-rally-photo-src-digvid
I also would like to say I think convos like this are urgently important especially because of the troves of people out there posting “Trump set this up” and they truly have nothing more than a vested interest of hate. Period. It’s all trying to feed and control the direction of the hysteria. We need concrete data to show the illogical foolishness of their theories and I unfortunately am not the Maverick for rounding all that up at this point in time. I do hope more skilled arm-chair reporters step up and properly line up all the evidence I have seen to shut down these dangerous, inflammatory accusations about him that will only feed a deeper civil divide. Twitter has all the videos and that’s like trying to find needles in a dense underbrush, so I rely on Substack to point me and I think they are doing a fabulous job.