Might I have that Karma number? There is power in many (calls). Additionally, I might gift a thesaurus to each so they might post items that are "okayed" for prime-time TV.
Remember to watch VSRF Live tonight: Pregnancy, Pharmaceuticals and the Question of Risk, with Dr. Adam Urato, a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist and maternal-fetal medicine physician with nearly 30 years of experience caring for pregnant women, including the most high-risk cases.
As far as I can judge his stack is inhabited by the evil-smelling trolls and not much else. One is hard pushed to see anyone who seems legit apart from the brave souls who challenge Paul's nonsense.
It's startling to see the quality of 'debate' on Paul Offit's substack.
As you say Jenna "...just a torrent of abuse. Sexual slurs. Name-calling. Middle-school filth."
Seriously!!! This guy Offit has been influential on vaccination policy for years, and this is the standard of discussion he allows in his comments.
It's absolutely pathetic...
But devastating to think of how Offit has been a party to suppressing genuine discussion on vaccination policy and practice.
Now here we are - there's no authentic voluntary informed consent for vaccination, because the 'information' is so highly questionable, and voluntariness has been destroyed by pressure, coercion, manipulation and...MANDATES.
The medical profession went along with this, collaborated with this travesty.
Thanks Jenna, and for your participation, and for this timely expose.
Crikey, what a vipers' nest is the Offit substack...
It's mind-boggling to think of the damage Paul Offit and his cronies have done by deliberately inhibiting open discussion on vaccination policy for years and years.
And it means there is no authentic informed consent for vaccination...think about that...
Seems that Offit's using the No True Scotsman logical fallacy.
Only in our current clown world can people refuse to acknowledge actual science by ignoring actual science. And denigrating people that are reasonably requesting things like peer review, placebo trials, and even just providing proof that pharma inventions actually work.
On another note - those commenters seem nice. What a bunch of shitheads.
There's quite a gang that has been responsible for suppressing discussion on vaccination policy and practice.
And as a result, I contend there is no authentic 'informed consent' for vaccination, because open discussion on the topic has been deliberately hindered.
If any of you have read any of Offit's Substack posts ("Beyond the Noise") and then deigned to politely and respectfully comment, you will find that his supporters or bots or maybe it's even Offit himself will attack you personally (and I mean VERY personally). Whoever it is will call you despicable names, try to find personal information about you, twist it, but "whoever it is" will never debate the merits of vaccinations. In one other disturbing element, I discovered that Paul Offit is following me on Substack! I'm not a scientist, I'm not a physician, I'm a former college history professor who reads widely and had a change of heart about the medical establishment since covid. I am not worth following, so it's a little creepy. So Offit won't debate and in his public comments about anyone who opposes vaccines, the only argument he's got is a logical fallacy: the ad hominem fallacy.
Indeed. I believe I have a few Musks following me. I never bother auditing the list, nor even looking at it. Bots will bot, human or otherwise. I choose to ignore.
I can't be sure it's Offit himself, but if that person is hiding behind Offit that way, it's weird. I'm always puzzled when I am alerted that anyone on Substack is following me.
...the WHICH of is WHY, Mary Ann, I am so PROUD of our BOLD ADVENTURESS mounting her steed and driving on over into the DEN to lay down some thoughtful questions to think about and, more importantly, coming back to us ALIVE! A little smoky, yes, a little warmed-up, maybe, but back. (She KNOWS I would not/could not do it for her and that any "final report" I submitted would be the stuff of fairy tales, but she would thank me anyway for my "bravery" in mounting a steed--and a pretense.) There are likely authentic minds over there that really ought to be hanging out somewhere else, but "how will they know, if no one go to them?"
Ahhhh!! I had no idea that this was going on. Thanks for loopng us in Jenna. I need to go through the comments section to support you, Kirsch, and others with a friggin brain. From briefly going through the comments, I saw the word "whore" thrown out there multiple times so not a very promising productive exchange lol.
Everyone knows that Offit won't debate because he would lose. Peer reviewed data is not the gold standard, it's become a turd standard. The real data gold mine which Kirsch has been actively looking at is recent primary raw unadulterated data from governments around the world.
If the the incredible level of censorship wasn't enough proof that the vaccines are trouble, the failure to do a simple comparison of all-cause mortality, vaxxed vs unvaxxed, should be all the proof any thinking adult could ever need.
Why debate for a million bucks when you can make hundreds of millions of dollars creating a bogus rotavirus vaccine Rota Teq. Debating for vaccines would only shine a light on his Franken science creation.
Bot or not, one would not welcome support from Trump Dick Sucker, Vatnik-Rapist or Bobby's Worm. As weird as their unquestioning membership of the Church of Vaccinology.
Great post. These people are pathetic. The name calling so unwarranted. Had no idea there’s so much hate out there. I’m truly sorry you were treated this way. You’re so strong Jenna - thank you 🙏🏻♥️
I wonder if the sock puppets are Offit himself... He is an unpleasant individual.
Here's a video depicting Paul Offit's response to Joshua Coleman's respectful request for an interview with the Vaxxed Bus, with Offit's response being: "Get outta here. Get the fuck outta here. I don’t want to talk to you. Alright." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5EDASGJsSY
Offit's response epitomises the arrogant and contemptuous attitude people face when they question vaccination policy and practice.
You’re absolutely right - intel assets, propaganda. For anyone not familiar with Operation Mockingbird, do some research on that and much of what we experience daily will make more sense!
"𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗠𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗯𝗶𝗿𝗱 was a covert CIA program that ran primarily during the Cold War (1950s–1970s) aimed at influencing and infiltrating U.S. media organizations to shape public opinion, spread propaganda, and counter Soviet influence."
"Allen Dulles, CIA Director, OVERSAW ITS EXPANSION." [my emph. #iamnotgrok]
What it did:
* Paid journalists to write articles or provide information.
* Funded front organizations (e.g., the National Student Association).
* Provided classified information to friendly reporters.
* Influenced editorial decisions through relationships with media executives.
Grok notes:
"The CIA did not control entire newsrooms or dictate daily coverage. Instead, it cultivated relationships and influenced specific stories or narratives." [too expensive; not really necessary: a few sellouts here, a few there]
"After the [Senator] Church Committee hearings and public outrage, the CIA agreed to end the practice of paying journalists for propaganda purposes. A 1977 CIA directive banned such relationships, though critics argue informal influence may have continued."
Isez:
Since that time, the CIA greatly reduced the number of public admissions to domestic operations aimed at perverting the U.S. Constitution.
Also there is no evidence the CIA influences what appears in peer-reviewed medical journals, although they emphasize they 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 if they wanted to and there 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 would be no evidence just like now.
Since the CIA's exit, media journalists reverted to selling out to their biggest advertising clients.
With the advent of accessible AI/LLM content, it's possible these kinds of rude, nutty troll responses might be (soon) flowing from AI services en masse, with fewer and fewer humans in the shadows consciously spewing forth these ridiculous insults.
I have mentioned this before; if the vaccines are as good as the manufacturers claim, they would be jubilant to have it retested again, their point would be made! The fact that they do NOT want further trials/tests indicates that they are hiding negative outcomes of which they are very well aware.
This is so expectedly typical of the left, literally NOTHING of substance to offer for what they claim, and if you disagree even a little, they'll shout you down, curse you to ends of the earth, somehow thinking they're on the moral high ground in doing so. This is their sacrosanct script.
Perhaps the only good thing to come out of the Covid “dempanic” is we found out that our government and its cohorts will and do lie to us. We thought only communist governments did that!
The truly hard part is that it's even worse than that. They want us all dead, and are coordinating at the global level to make that happen! I'm looking forward to watching Tom Luongo's video claiming they have lost their grip:
You have to assume Offit is being paid by big pharma, as are many of his peers. His paymasters would never allow him to participate in a real debate on this subject for many reasons, first of which would be exposure of the cover up and the revelation that the entire vaccine medical establishment is corrupt. If going along to get along is what keeps the grant money coming, that’s what they do.
100%! Follow the money (used as a carrot or a stick) and you will discover the incentive behind Offit’s despicable behavior. Those with big egos are so easy to compromise.
Thank you, Jenna, for taking the time to write about Offit's unwillingness to debate and the filth that his commentators express. It's truly shocking. It was time that someone exposed all this.
The last time I commented on Offit's Substack, someone replied with a comment about my husband! Last summer I was also called a "filthy repugnant whore." Such a ridiculous comment when the topic is vaccines!
All you have to do is ask an innocent question about vaccine safety and efficacy, and you too can become a member of the Filthy Repugnant Whore Club. 🤣
Paul Offit is an arrogant SOB. Great post Jenna. And his unwillingness to debate is no surprise as he truly believes what he spouts as science. I’m so happy that HHS has pulled funding from the AAP. Take that Paul Offit!
yes! yay! there is no coherent reason whatsoever for tax dollars to go to a trade union, especially one that operates more like a mafia protection racket.
"Debates are only dangerous to people who rely on status rather than substance."
This reminds me of Aaron Siri's recent statement that he, as a lawyer, has to bring actual evidence; he can't just rely on credentials like the MDs do.
Who would know best about the corruption within the peer reviewed process.....the editors in chief of the most respected peer reviewed medical journals:
Dr. Marcia Angell, Harvard physician and editor in chief of the NEJM said:
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor.” She wrote a revealing book years ago where she revealed the truth about the pharmaceutical industry and the regulatory capture of our federal public health agencies. The Truth About Drug Companies - How They Deceive Us And What To Do About It.
I had trouble sleeping for days after reading it. She was way ahead of her time and it's interesting to note that she was not persecuted by Harvard or her peers - simply ignored.
Dr. Relman, another former editor in chief of the NEJM said this in 2002 - “The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.”
Richard Horton, editor in chief of the Lancet said:
“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness” (2). Horton R. Offline: What is medicine’s 5 sigma? [Last accessed August 5, 2015]. www.thelancet.com. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736%2815%2960696-1.pdf.
This guy Horton is the worst because after what he wrote above in 2015, he proceeded to publish "studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest" during Covid. Shame on him. Shame on all of them.......
Shame on us for continuing to believe anything that they publish.
“And Offit hasn’t deleted their slurs or blocked them from continuing to comment.)”
Says a lot, doesn’t it.
Excellent point, absolutely.
Maybe he’s too busy preening or collecting swag to read them. I’m giving a quick call to Karma.
Might I have that Karma number? There is power in many (calls). Additionally, I might gift a thesaurus to each so they might post items that are "okayed" for prime-time TV.
🤔. I got a busy signal. Back later.
Did he even take the jab? I am just not sure these people have.
And I would also like the Karma number please.
Im still getting a busy signal. 🤔😟
LOL 🤣🤣🤣
Since he's not deleting anything I posted this:
Remember to watch VSRF Live tonight: Pregnancy, Pharmaceuticals and the Question of Risk, with Dr. Adam Urato, a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist and maternal-fetal medicine physician with nearly 30 years of experience caring for pregnant women, including the most high-risk cases.
https://rumble.com/v7340k8-episode-208-pregnancy-pharmaceuticals-and-the-question-of-risk-with-dr.-ada.html
Steve Kirsch will probably comment on this back and forth either before or after the interview.
👍🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
As far as I can judge his stack is inhabited by the evil-smelling trolls and not much else. One is hard pushed to see anyone who seems legit apart from the brave souls who challenge Paul's nonsense.
It's startling to see the quality of 'debate' on Paul Offit's substack.
As you say Jenna "...just a torrent of abuse. Sexual slurs. Name-calling. Middle-school filth."
Seriously!!! This guy Offit has been influential on vaccination policy for years, and this is the standard of discussion he allows in his comments.
It's absolutely pathetic...
But devastating to think of how Offit has been a party to suppressing genuine discussion on vaccination policy and practice.
Now here we are - there's no authentic voluntary informed consent for vaccination, because the 'information' is so highly questionable, and voluntariness has been destroyed by pressure, coercion, manipulation and...MANDATES.
The medical profession went along with this, collaborated with this travesty.
It's a disaster.
You made several stunningly brilliant comments on that post! I was so happy to see it!👏👏👏
Thanks Jenna, and for your participation, and for this timely expose.
Crikey, what a vipers' nest is the Offit substack...
It's mind-boggling to think of the damage Paul Offit and his cronies have done by deliberately inhibiting open discussion on vaccination policy for years and years.
And it means there is no authentic informed consent for vaccination...think about that...
Jenna, re Offit, Also see this article: Debunking the Vaccine-Autism Link. Newsweek, Oct 24 2008, updated June 03 2010: https://www.newsweek.com/dr-paul-offit-debunking-vaccine-autism-link-91933
Seems that Offit's using the No True Scotsman logical fallacy.
Only in our current clown world can people refuse to acknowledge actual science by ignoring actual science. And denigrating people that are reasonably requesting things like peer review, placebo trials, and even just providing proof that pharma inventions actually work.
On another note - those commenters seem nice. What a bunch of shitheads.
We call him All Profit
It is questionable that Paul Offit even truly owns the stack. Anybody could write it. There is that nasty piece of work David Gorski for example.
I think it's Offit's substack.
And yes, David Gorski is a nasty piece of work.
There's quite a gang that has been responsible for suppressing discussion on vaccination policy and practice.
And as a result, I contend there is no authentic 'informed consent' for vaccination, because open discussion on the topic has been deliberately hindered.
If any of you have read any of Offit's Substack posts ("Beyond the Noise") and then deigned to politely and respectfully comment, you will find that his supporters or bots or maybe it's even Offit himself will attack you personally (and I mean VERY personally). Whoever it is will call you despicable names, try to find personal information about you, twist it, but "whoever it is" will never debate the merits of vaccinations. In one other disturbing element, I discovered that Paul Offit is following me on Substack! I'm not a scientist, I'm not a physician, I'm a former college history professor who reads widely and had a change of heart about the medical establishment since covid. I am not worth following, so it's a little creepy. So Offit won't debate and in his public comments about anyone who opposes vaccines, the only argument he's got is a logical fallacy: the ad hominem fallacy.
Mary Ann - are you sure it’s really Offit following you?
I got all excited to see that Ed Dowd and Toby Rogers were following me until I realized it wasn’t really them.
Indeed. I believe I have a few Musks following me. I never bother auditing the list, nor even looking at it. Bots will bot, human or otherwise. I choose to ignore.
I can't be sure it's Offit himself, but if that person is hiding behind Offit that way, it's weird. I'm always puzzled when I am alerted that anyone on Substack is following me.
I agree, it wouldn't surprise me if it's Offit himself behind the disgusting comments.
...the WHICH of is WHY, Mary Ann, I am so PROUD of our BOLD ADVENTURESS mounting her steed and driving on over into the DEN to lay down some thoughtful questions to think about and, more importantly, coming back to us ALIVE! A little smoky, yes, a little warmed-up, maybe, but back. (She KNOWS I would not/could not do it for her and that any "final report" I submitted would be the stuff of fairy tales, but she would thank me anyway for my "bravery" in mounting a steed--and a pretense.) There are likely authentic minds over there that really ought to be hanging out somewhere else, but "how will they know, if no one go to them?"
Ahhhh!! I had no idea that this was going on. Thanks for loopng us in Jenna. I need to go through the comments section to support you, Kirsch, and others with a friggin brain. From briefly going through the comments, I saw the word "whore" thrown out there multiple times so not a very promising productive exchange lol.
Everyone knows that Offit won't debate because he would lose. Peer reviewed data is not the gold standard, it's become a turd standard. The real data gold mine which Kirsch has been actively looking at is recent primary raw unadulterated data from governments around the world.
If the the incredible level of censorship wasn't enough proof that the vaccines are trouble, the failure to do a simple comparison of all-cause mortality, vaxxed vs unvaxxed, should be all the proof any thinking adult could ever need.
Why debate for a million bucks when you can make hundreds of millions of dollars creating a bogus rotavirus vaccine Rota Teq. Debating for vaccines would only shine a light on his Franken science creation.
So true!
Bot or not, one would not welcome support from Trump Dick Sucker, Vatnik-Rapist or Bobby's Worm. As weird as their unquestioning membership of the Church of Vaccinology.
I agree… But if that was my intent, I think I would work diligently at crafting more thoughtful rebuttals than “you are a repugnant whore.” 😂
I keep waiting for "your mother was a hamster, and your father smells of elderberries." 🤣🤣🤣
😂
LMFAO!!!
Great post. These people are pathetic. The name calling so unwarranted. Had no idea there’s so much hate out there. I’m truly sorry you were treated this way. You’re so strong Jenna - thank you 🙏🏻♥️
And you're so kind. Thank you. XOXO
Like SNL's Dan Aykroyd: “Jane, you ignorant slut.”?
Trolls are not very bright sad to say. 77th Brigade is full of them. I find teasing them is helpful and rather fun.
I wonder if the sock puppets are Offit himself... He is an unpleasant individual.
Here's a video depicting Paul Offit's response to Joshua Coleman's respectful request for an interview with the Vaxxed Bus, with Offit's response being: "Get outta here. Get the fuck outta here. I don’t want to talk to you. Alright." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5EDASGJsSY
Offit's response epitomises the arrogant and contemptuous attitude people face when they question vaccination policy and practice.
That really does tell you what you need to know, doesn’t it?
Someone should post that link in a comment on his stack.
That video says it all.
That might be the one comment he bans! 🤣
You’re absolutely right - intel assets, propaganda. For anyone not familiar with Operation Mockingbird, do some research on that and much of what we experience daily will make more sense!
AIsez: [grok]
"𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗠𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗯𝗶𝗿𝗱 was a covert CIA program that ran primarily during the Cold War (1950s–1970s) aimed at influencing and infiltrating U.S. media organizations to shape public opinion, spread propaganda, and counter Soviet influence."
"Allen Dulles, CIA Director, OVERSAW ITS EXPANSION." [my emph. #iamnotgrok]
What it did:
* Paid journalists to write articles or provide information.
* Funded front organizations (e.g., the National Student Association).
* Provided classified information to friendly reporters.
* Influenced editorial decisions through relationships with media executives.
Grok notes:
"The CIA did not control entire newsrooms or dictate daily coverage. Instead, it cultivated relationships and influenced specific stories or narratives." [too expensive; not really necessary: a few sellouts here, a few there]
"After the [Senator] Church Committee hearings and public outrage, the CIA agreed to end the practice of paying journalists for propaganda purposes. A 1977 CIA directive banned such relationships, though critics argue informal influence may have continued."
Isez:
Since that time, the CIA greatly reduced the number of public admissions to domestic operations aimed at perverting the U.S. Constitution.
Also there is no evidence the CIA influences what appears in peer-reviewed medical journals, although they emphasize they 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 if they wanted to and there 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 would be no evidence just like now.
Since the CIA's exit, media journalists reverted to selling out to their biggest advertising clients.
Same and only reason I subscribe to the New York Times. They spoon feed me fodder!
With the advent of accessible AI/LLM content, it's possible these kinds of rude, nutty troll responses might be (soon) flowing from AI services en masse, with fewer and fewer humans in the shadows consciously spewing forth these ridiculous insults.
Probably more than possible. Also terrifying.
I have mentioned this before; if the vaccines are as good as the manufacturers claim, they would be jubilant to have it retested again, their point would be made! The fact that they do NOT want further trials/tests indicates that they are hiding negative outcomes of which they are very well aware.
And if they are that good, let's remove the liability protections the vax manufacturers have enjoyed since 1986.
This is so expectedly typical of the left, literally NOTHING of substance to offer for what they claim, and if you disagree even a little, they'll shout you down, curse you to ends of the earth, somehow thinking they're on the moral high ground in doing so. This is their sacrosanct script.
Perhaps the only good thing to come out of the Covid “dempanic” is we found out that our government and its cohorts will and do lie to us. We thought only communist governments did that!
The truly hard part is that it's even worse than that. They want us all dead, and are coordinating at the global level to make that happen! I'm looking forward to watching Tom Luongo's video claiming they have lost their grip:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNhznHUxd_U
You have to assume Offit is being paid by big pharma, as are many of his peers. His paymasters would never allow him to participate in a real debate on this subject for many reasons, first of which would be exposure of the cover up and the revelation that the entire vaccine medical establishment is corrupt. If going along to get along is what keeps the grant money coming, that’s what they do.
100%! Follow the money (used as a carrot or a stick) and you will discover the incentive behind Offit’s despicable behavior. Those with big egos are so easy to compromise.
Thank you, Jenna, for taking the time to write about Offit's unwillingness to debate and the filth that his commentators express. It's truly shocking. It was time that someone exposed all this.
if being called a filthy repugnant whore multiple times is what it takes, sign me up!😂
The last time I commented on Offit's Substack, someone replied with a comment about my husband! Last summer I was also called a "filthy repugnant whore." Such a ridiculous comment when the topic is vaccines!
That’s actually a little bit scary🙈
Dayyum ... I feel left out not being called a filthy repugnant whore. Maybe I gotta try harder and get more involved. 😂✌️🤎🤙
For a while I was actually insulted that my social media accounts hadn’t gotten shut down… And then they got shut down.😂
All you have to do is ask an innocent question about vaccine safety and efficacy, and you too can become a member of the Filthy Repugnant Whore Club. 🤣
Well then, guess I'm already a member. Their AI prompts prolly haven't found me yet. 😂😂😂
A select group, for sure! Especially since your first name is Keith!
Logic is not the trolls best attribute. However such comments are inevitable from them as we are in World Whore Three with the Whore of Babylon!
I’ve posted this before; “You want the truth you can’t handle the truth “ also “the truth is out there.” Keep up the great fight!
Paul Offit is an arrogant SOB. Great post Jenna. And his unwillingness to debate is no surprise as he truly believes what he spouts as science. I’m so happy that HHS has pulled funding from the AAP. Take that Paul Offit!
yes! yay! there is no coherent reason whatsoever for tax dollars to go to a trade union, especially one that operates more like a mafia protection racket.
"Debates are only dangerous to people who rely on status rather than substance."
This reminds me of Aaron Siri's recent statement that he, as a lawyer, has to bring actual evidence; he can't just rely on credentials like the MDs do.
That was a SMOKING rebuttal!!! :)
Who would know best about the corruption within the peer reviewed process.....the editors in chief of the most respected peer reviewed medical journals:
Dr. Marcia Angell, Harvard physician and editor in chief of the NEJM said:
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor.” She wrote a revealing book years ago where she revealed the truth about the pharmaceutical industry and the regulatory capture of our federal public health agencies. The Truth About Drug Companies - How They Deceive Us And What To Do About It.
https://www.amazon.com/Truth-About-Drug-Companies-Deceive/dp/0375760946
I had trouble sleeping for days after reading it. She was way ahead of her time and it's interesting to note that she was not persecuted by Harvard or her peers - simply ignored.
Dr. Relman, another former editor in chief of the NEJM said this in 2002 - “The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.”
Richard Horton, editor in chief of the Lancet said:
“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness” (2). Horton R. Offline: What is medicine’s 5 sigma? [Last accessed August 5, 2015]. www.thelancet.com. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736%2815%2960696-1.pdf.
This guy Horton is the worst because after what he wrote above in 2015, he proceeded to publish "studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest" during Covid. Shame on him. Shame on all of them.......
Shame on us for continuing to believe anything that they publish.