Another great post, Jenna, although I do take issue with one sentence:
"To be fair, when it mattered most, at least one agent did what you want every single one of them ready to do—threw his entire body between the threat and the target"
I realize that I'll be the odd man out here, but while I value the president's life, I don't value it more than the life of one of the agents protecting him.
I actually don’t disagree with you—no one’s life is “worth more” than anyone else’s. But that’s also the job he signed up for. The whole premise of that role is, essentially, “if things go sideways, you become the shield.” It’s not because the person being protected is more valuable—it’s because the mission is. Same logic as a soldier jumping on a grenade: it's not a value judgment, it's a job description.
I’m finding it more difficult every day to believe anything that happens “out there”. Thank God for you and Jeff Childers. You da angry peach MVP. 🤬🍑😘❤️
"More than 250 journalists not only planned to boycott the dinner itself, but to be on site to “forcefully demonstrate opposition” to President Trump and “ensure he doesn’t feel welcome.”
Ahhh, nothing expresses "total lack of bias", "basic fairness", and "dispassionate neutrality" quite so well as "forceful opposition." Bless the little spots where their hearts used to be.
Other. At this point, it's more accurate to assume that everything we see on TV is staged instead of actual reality. If the first "assassination attempt" was fake, then we can only assume everything else that follows will be too.
Good morning. Can someone please ask outlets like The New York Times, PBS, Reuters, etc. To call this shooting what it was ... An "Assimilation Attempt" and not an "Incident"?
Can we say both legit and staged? Legit in the sense that yes, someone intended to kill the president. And staged in the sense that SOMEONE used yet another unhinged patsy to assassinate the president? Thats my vote. He tried. He failed. He did NOT act alone.
Here is a quote that I’m trying to paraphrase “When you come for the King you better not miss”. Trump wins again. The Marxist/Islamic/Globalist Cabal loses again.
I voted “I don’t know” on this poll question. I do know, intentional or not, that the war on Iran moved the Epstein files off Page 1. This event now moves the Iran War off Page 1. It was a new, unexpected rung on the Escalation Ladder.
Another great post, Jenna, although I do take issue with one sentence:
"To be fair, when it mattered most, at least one agent did what you want every single one of them ready to do—threw his entire body between the threat and the target"
I realize that I'll be the odd man out here, but while I value the president's life, I don't value it more than the life of one of the agents protecting him.
I actually don’t disagree with you—no one’s life is “worth more” than anyone else’s. But that’s also the job he signed up for. The whole premise of that role is, essentially, “if things go sideways, you become the shield.” It’s not because the person being protected is more valuable—it’s because the mission is. Same logic as a soldier jumping on a grenade: it's not a value judgment, it's a job description.
I’m finding it more difficult every day to believe anything that happens “out there”. Thank God for you and Jeff Childers. You da angry peach MVP. 🤬🍑😘❤️
"More than 250 journalists not only planned to boycott the dinner itself, but to be on site to “forcefully demonstrate opposition” to President Trump and “ensure he doesn’t feel welcome.”
Ahhh, nothing expresses "total lack of bias", "basic fairness", and "dispassionate neutrality" quite so well as "forceful opposition." Bless the little spots where their hearts used to be.
Other. At this point, it's more accurate to assume that everything we see on TV is staged instead of actual reality. If the first "assassination attempt" was fake, then we can only assume everything else that follows will be too.
(buries self deeper under sand)
Good morning. Can someone please ask outlets like The New York Times, PBS, Reuters, etc. To call this shooting what it was ... An "Assimilation Attempt" and not an "Incident"?
Yes, please.
I'm still waiting for the full investigation into Butler. In the meantime, I guess we *will* be getting the new ballroom...
Can we say both legit and staged? Legit in the sense that yes, someone intended to kill the president. And staged in the sense that SOMEONE used yet another unhinged patsy to assassinate the president? Thats my vote. He tried. He failed. He did NOT act alone.
Here is a quote that I’m trying to paraphrase “When you come for the King you better not miss”. Trump wins again. The Marxist/Islamic/Globalist Cabal loses again.
I voted “I don’t know” on this poll question. I do know, intentional or not, that the war on Iran moved the Epstein files off Page 1. This event now moves the Iran War off Page 1. It was a new, unexpected rung on the Escalation Ladder.