Oof. That information shifts the frame a little. Thanks for doing the watching and reporting. No way I have the stomach for it. Agree that whoever killed the children must be held accountable. Even the mentally unwell must be accountable for their actions; otherwise we stop defining wrong as wrong and start relabeling it as mental illness. Where does that end?
I have to say Psyop when the information unfolds in a way that causes conclusions to change. You never get the full picture all at once. I believe that is intentional to leverage the fact that many people are unable to change their view once they have committed to it. They can't admit being wrong even if for a short time. It creates turmoil and arguments and division.
Thank you Jenna for always being able to change your mind based on facts, not previous assumptions. Thank you for digging in to a difficult subject that none of us want to spend the time on. It is what keeps the truth alive.
I no longer have any clue as to what happened that awful day except that three lovely children are dead. Was the lone juror a hero or an obstructionist? I thought a hero, but now I don't know. All I do know is that none of us know. Whoever did kill those beautiful babies will one day stand before God.
Like you I thought she was guilty and I don't excuse murder because of hormones. Then I saw that he very quickly remarried after quickly going on a trip after the murders and then his new father in law bought the newlyweds a house. And that she never really confessed. There's that old thing of "who benefits?" and he lost his kids but he clearly benefitted financially and if he was tired of dealing with a mentally challenged wife, he also benefitted. Now I wonder if he saw that previous murder in Ireland by the woman who also was a nurse and murdered her 3 children and the husband came home to find them. Maybe he did a copycat crime. Not sure at all that she did it now.
Play out the logic: Patrick kills the kids, goes upstairs and tries to kill Lindsay by making it look she committed suicide, throws her out a window, sees she’s not dead, goes downstairs, then outside and calls 911 BEFORE she expires. Why not wait until she’s dead? Ridiculous.
If you watch the trial, the timeline doesn't add up. That's the point. (But HE SAYS so and so, so that becomes the story.) Also from my response to your same comment above:
I asked Gemini how can they be sure the kids were alive when he left to go to the stores. The answer was not convincing at all. It said they would have screamed and she would have heard. They did not pinpoint the exact time of death of the children, just within a reasonable time frame. So theoretically she could have gone to the basement and seen them dead and decided to jump from the horror of seeing them. The watch shows her movements but does not prove she committed the murders. Gemini admitted that. So, with the timeline discrepancies...I would have to go with reasonable doubt at this point.
If you’re going to post your thoughts exactly the same in two different places, those of us replying to those thoughts also have to paste our reply in both those places. It would be easier if you said what you thought in one spot and left it at that.
My reply to the first time you posted this:
“Just playing devil’s advocate here in “playing it out”: maybe because he couldn’t let too much time pass between when they could place him at the house and when he finally called, because then he will be questioned “why’d you wait so long to call?” It was less risky to gamble with the police and hoping they found her dead or she is unable to be resuscitated.
I honestly have become confused after being adamant she deserves the electric chair.
If this whole thing WERE a psyop from the beginning, they KNEW we were ripe for a “male hero” and primed to come down on lunatic women who would support her.
I’m confused how so little of what Jenna discovered was revealed to the public during the trial. And the majority of the public trusted that what was reported was accurate and made their opinions. So either our justice system is failing miserably at getting to the truth and is no longer reliable, or it DID get to the reasonable doubt and the media once again failed us in letting us see why.
Or, it’s exactly as we have seen it to be, and she’s guilty.
I for one am now apprehensive about declaring what justice should be in this case.”
I guess no one wants to address what I wrote before, which is: if she did not kill her children, get on the stand and testify to that. Or testify “my husband tried to kill me by slashing my wrists, stabbing my neck and throwing me out a window”. If I knew I didn’t kill my children. I would demand to be put on the stand.
Hopefully there is an investigation to either exonerate or tie Patrick to the heinous murders. Then, a new trial. This case has become a national referendum on the mental health of women in general. We better get this right.
“Changing your mind requires a certain tolerance for discovering—and admitting—that you were spectacularly wrong. Not everyone enjoys that as much as I do.” 🤗
Isn’t it freeing, though? I’m so grateful that earlier in life I went through a couple of ‘oh shit’ crises where I had to tear up some old scripts and then write some new ones. I’ve liked myself better since then.
Being able and willing to admit you’re wrong is what marks you as a real truth-seeker. Keep doing your seeking and finding out loud! You have a delightfully unique voice that this sorry society really needs right now.
"Beyond a reasonable doubt" does not mean "beyond a shadow of a doubt". It seems unreasonable to me to suspect Patrick murdered his children and made a very ineffectual attempt to kill her, when she was the one with psychological issues and had said she had thoughts of harming her kids. Oh, and isn't he on video at the store and restaurant while the kids were being strangled to death?
Play out the logic: Patrick kills the kids, goes upstairs and tries to kill Lindsay by making it look she committed suicide, throws her out a window, sees she’s not dead, goes downstairs, the. outside and calls 911 BEFORE she expires. Why not wait until she’s dead? Ridiculous.
And? Did they call 911? If he tried to kill her, after all that demonic shit he did, why bother tossing her out a window? Let her exsanguinate inside the house. Problem solved.
Just playing devil’s advocate here in “playing it out”: maybe because he couldn’t let too much time pass between when they could place him at the house and when he finally called, because then he will be questioned “why’d you wait so long to call?” It was less risky to gamble with the police and hoping they found her dead or she is unable to be resuscitated.
I honestly have become confused after being adamant she deserves the electric chair.
If this whole thing WERE a psyop from the beginning, they KNEW we were ripe for a “male hero” and primed to come down on lunatic women who would support her.
I’m confused how so little of what Jenna discovered was revealed to the public during the trial. And the majority of the public trusted that what was reported was accurate and made their opinions. So either our justice system is failing miserably at getting to the truth and is no longer reliable, or it DID get to the reasonable doubt and the media once again failed us in letting us see why.
Or, it’s exactly as we have seen it to be, and she’s guilty.
I for one am now apprehensive about declaring what justice should be in this case.
Same. It makes me be mad at myself for being so easily swayed to popular opinion, when instead I should be like “Have I been presented ALL the facts?” But the jury has been given more than we have, number one, and I trust Jesus number two. (Or maybe should be vice a versa!)
I am not really interested in this thing, other than reading posts by people I follow, and the odd post substack recommends. I don’t remember even hearing about this when it happened. Did it even make the news back then?
But I just have to say, “Wow!” I started following you when I heard you on Dr. Karin’s podcast and was impressed with the things you said. And this post is further confirmation that I was correct in my assessment.
I have not read a take like this from anyone else, and I admire that you sought out information yourself and weren’t content to receive a pre-packaged narrative.
This was a very interesting post, and I commend you for posting what will surely bother lots of people who expect you to just spout the same talking points.
I appreciate the kind words, Marcy! I really did struggle with posting this, because I KNOW lots of people don't want to consider any other option. I guess they're not my people. :)
Marcy—I like your phrasing of ‘pre-packaged narrative’. We have been fed so many, probably beginning with JFK, that I, for one, am beyond bloated and getting ready for a cleanse. Thank you and thanks to Jenna!
Things got weird for me when I started siding with the pink-clad AWFLs. I can’t even remember where I read that she confessed, but it goes to show, you can’t trust anyone to tell the untarnished truth. “Do your own research” isn’t limited to the Plandemic!
Edgar Cayce said that when we die, we feel the feelings of those we loved and those we harmed. Even if this theory is incorrect, it would do us all some good to chew on that thought.
21st century America has become a spiritually vacuous society where too many people do not want to honor the Ten Commandments, one of which is to not murder people (and that’s murder, not kill in self-defense).
Those brain drugs come with warnings that we've all heard, "may cause death."
Damn it Jenna, you’ve dragged me down this rabbit hole.
I’m not really sure why the cops didn’t look into this. However, it appears that the kids were alive when Clancy sent Patrick out to pick up meds and dinner.
If Patrick did it, surely his movements could be (have been) traced, the time of death of all the children estimated and the possibility that he offed them all considered. The evidence (such as it is) doesn’t seem to conform to that timeline. Consider that he either had to commit the murders then go out, come back and then call the cops. Remember that one child died after the EMTs arrived. I don’t think that timeline would make sense.
The other alternative supporting the “Patrick did it” theory would be that he got meds and dinner came back, offed them all and then called the cops. So, the key here is how long between his arrival and the 911 call? Since she allegedly texted him while he was out that would show her alive at the time. Was the text verified?
The theory that seems more reasonable to me it that Clancy had it out for her husband and decided to destroy the family to get back at him.
But, the police should have investigated both parents for the killings.
In any case an absolute tragedy. In my extended family we’ve had our contentious marriages/partnerships. But everyone looks out for the kids and morns the loss of a child. I can’t imagine the evil that led to this situation. I thank God that I can’t. And, I’m glad that I wasn’t on the jury.
Having not your patience for investigation I pushed the claim that Patrick did this into an AI and got this answer:
Patrick’s role and the claim that he killed the family
Patrick testified as a prosecution witness. He described her as a dedicated mother who later spiraled, said he did not understand psychosis at the time, and has publicly framed her as ill rather than evil and said he forgives her. He later sued some of her doctors, alleging negligent treatment contributed to the deaths. He has remarried. Investigators collected his devices as well and reconstructed the evening with video, phones, and communications. He was ruled out as a suspect. 
Online theories (especially on TikTok and X) claim he strangled the children, framed Lindsay, drugged her, or pushed her from the window. Common talking points include DNA on the bands, lack of her fingerprints, a “missing” 15 minutes before he appears on CVS video, later remarriage, and skepticism that a mother would do this. 
Those claims do not hold up against the public record:
• Video places him at two businesses during the only window in which the children could have been killed after he last saw them alive. She answered his call from CVS while he was gone.
• She has repeatedly described herself as the actor to her husband and to multiple clinicians. Her lawyers have not claimed she did not do it.
• Scene reconstruction (blood in the bedroom she occupied, her injuries, her DNA outside, stair data on her devices, children last seen with her) matches her being the only adult in the house.
• Mixed family DNA on household bands plus his handling of the bodies after discovery does not place him at the scene during the killings.
• Drive time, parking, looking for a product, and a short phone call easily account for the interval before he walks into the CVS camera. There is no corroborated “mystery gap” large enough for him to return home, kill three children, stage a suicide attempt, and get to the store on camera.
• No forensic, digital, or witness evidence has been presented that he was home, that he used the bands, or that he inflicted her injuries. Police executed many warrants and reconstructed phones and computers.
A frame-up would require him to leave, return unseen, kill three children with household bands, cut her and throw her from a window in a way that produced her injuries and DNA outside, lock the bedroom, leave again, appear on two stores’ cameras, and have her later consistently confess in ways that match the scene—while her own defense team treats her as the actor. That is not a reasonable reading of the evidence. Disbelief that a mother could do this, anger at gaps in postpartum care, and selective clips of a long trial explain why the theories spread; they are not a substitute for proof. 
The hard remaining question in the case is mental state and criminal responsibility, which is why the jury deadlocked—not who physically killed the children.
I have to admit that Ai is extremely impressive in situations like this. I still have concerns about it being controlled by nefarious actors, but still....
Sounds like reasonable doubt. Being married to a homicide detective, I can attest that getting a conviction in court is a HUGE win. Husband doesn't pay any attention to these clickbait cases, but I wonder if they did a polygraph on Patrick (not that they hold up in court most of the time).
Thank you for your deep dive. I think people needed to read this. People tend to believe the headlines in MSM and think it’s fact or the truth. Which is surprising to me considering we selectively don’t generally believe the MSM. Like I had said previously, I had watched most of the trial and came away with exactly the same opinion that you so clearly suggested. My heart breaks for those children and I have too many unanswered questions.
Oof. That information shifts the frame a little. Thanks for doing the watching and reporting. No way I have the stomach for it. Agree that whoever killed the children must be held accountable. Even the mentally unwell must be accountable for their actions; otherwise we stop defining wrong as wrong and start relabeling it as mental illness. Where does that end?
Does “accountable” mean the electric chair, or a forensic unit in a psych hospital?
I have to say Psyop when the information unfolds in a way that causes conclusions to change. You never get the full picture all at once. I believe that is intentional to leverage the fact that many people are unable to change their view once they have committed to it. They can't admit being wrong even if for a short time. It creates turmoil and arguments and division.
Thank you Jenna for always being able to change your mind based on facts, not previous assumptions. Thank you for digging in to a difficult subject that none of us want to spend the time on. It is what keeps the truth alive.
Yes, thank you Jenna! I am always happy to look at the facts as they undoubtedly tell the story.
I will look at the links and come back with comments!
I no longer have any clue as to what happened that awful day except that three lovely children are dead. Was the lone juror a hero or an obstructionist? I thought a hero, but now I don't know. All I do know is that none of us know. Whoever did kill those beautiful babies will one day stand before God.
🎯🎯🎯
Hear, hear!
You don’t leave a psychotic, drug impaired mother alone with her children.
Take it from there…
Like you I thought she was guilty and I don't excuse murder because of hormones. Then I saw that he very quickly remarried after quickly going on a trip after the murders and then his new father in law bought the newlyweds a house. And that she never really confessed. There's that old thing of "who benefits?" and he lost his kids but he clearly benefitted financially and if he was tired of dealing with a mentally challenged wife, he also benefitted. Now I wonder if he saw that previous murder in Ireland by the woman who also was a nurse and murdered her 3 children and the husband came home to find them. Maybe he did a copycat crime. Not sure at all that she did it now.
Play out the logic: Patrick kills the kids, goes upstairs and tries to kill Lindsay by making it look she committed suicide, throws her out a window, sees she’s not dead, goes downstairs, then outside and calls 911 BEFORE she expires. Why not wait until she’s dead? Ridiculous.
If you watch the trial, the timeline doesn't add up. That's the point. (But HE SAYS so and so, so that becomes the story.) Also from my response to your same comment above:
The neighbor saw her in the yard at 5:50. This was on the news. https://www.tiktok.com/@cc.forensictherapist/video/7682184120868424991?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc
I asked Gemini how can they be sure the kids were alive when he left to go to the stores. The answer was not convincing at all. It said they would have screamed and she would have heard. They did not pinpoint the exact time of death of the children, just within a reasonable time frame. So theoretically she could have gone to the basement and seen them dead and decided to jump from the horror of seeing them. The watch shows her movements but does not prove she committed the murders. Gemini admitted that. So, with the timeline discrepancies...I would have to go with reasonable doubt at this point.
If you’re going to post your thoughts exactly the same in two different places, those of us replying to those thoughts also have to paste our reply in both those places. It would be easier if you said what you thought in one spot and left it at that.
My reply to the first time you posted this:
“Just playing devil’s advocate here in “playing it out”: maybe because he couldn’t let too much time pass between when they could place him at the house and when he finally called, because then he will be questioned “why’d you wait so long to call?” It was less risky to gamble with the police and hoping they found her dead or she is unable to be resuscitated.
I honestly have become confused after being adamant she deserves the electric chair.
If this whole thing WERE a psyop from the beginning, they KNEW we were ripe for a “male hero” and primed to come down on lunatic women who would support her.
I’m confused how so little of what Jenna discovered was revealed to the public during the trial. And the majority of the public trusted that what was reported was accurate and made their opinions. So either our justice system is failing miserably at getting to the truth and is no longer reliable, or it DID get to the reasonable doubt and the media once again failed us in letting us see why.
Or, it’s exactly as we have seen it to be, and she’s guilty.
I for one am now apprehensive about declaring what justice should be in this case.”
I guess no one wants to address what I wrote before, which is: if she did not kill her children, get on the stand and testify to that. Or testify “my husband tried to kill me by slashing my wrists, stabbing my neck and throwing me out a window”. If I knew I didn’t kill my children. I would demand to be put on the stand.
Hopefully there is an investigation to either exonerate or tie Patrick to the heinous murders. Then, a new trial. This case has become a national referendum on the mental health of women in general. We better get this right.
Oh Jenna... I'm sending a search and rescue party down that rabbit hole to find ya.
My first thought was that I wished there was this much media and human engagement during the Fauci hearings.
“Changing your mind requires a certain tolerance for discovering—and admitting—that you were spectacularly wrong. Not everyone enjoys that as much as I do.” 🤗
Isn’t it freeing, though? I’m so grateful that earlier in life I went through a couple of ‘oh shit’ crises where I had to tear up some old scripts and then write some new ones. I’ve liked myself better since then.
Being able and willing to admit you’re wrong is what marks you as a real truth-seeker. Keep doing your seeking and finding out loud! You have a delightfully unique voice that this sorry society really needs right now.
Another reason I chose to follow Jenna!
"beyond a reasonable doubt" has to be the foundation of our legal system. We can not convict people based on "it seems like she did it".
"Beyond a reasonable doubt" does not mean "beyond a shadow of a doubt". It seems unreasonable to me to suspect Patrick murdered his children and made a very ineffectual attempt to kill her, when she was the one with psychological issues and had said she had thoughts of harming her kids. Oh, and isn't he on video at the store and restaurant while the kids were being strangled to death?
Maybe click on some of the links😉
No need to. Patrick said . . .
🫢
Did she say it or did Patrick say she said it? I agree with Jenna-click some of the links.
Agreed. Way too many sketchy things here.
Play out the logic: Patrick kills the kids, goes upstairs and tries to kill Lindsay by making it look she committed suicide, throws her out a window, sees she’s not dead, goes downstairs, the. outside and calls 911 BEFORE she expires. Why not wait until she’s dead? Ridiculous.
The neighbor saw her in the yard at 5:50. This was on the news. https://www.tiktok.com/@cc.forensictherapist/video/7682184120868424991?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc
And? Did they call 911? If he tried to kill her, after all that demonic shit he did, why bother tossing her out a window? Let her exsanguinate inside the house. Problem solved.
Just playing devil’s advocate here in “playing it out”: maybe because he couldn’t let too much time pass between when they could place him at the house and when he finally called, because then he will be questioned “why’d you wait so long to call?” It was less risky to gamble with the police and hoping they found her dead or she is unable to be resuscitated.
I honestly have become confused after being adamant she deserves the electric chair.
If this whole thing WERE a psyop from the beginning, they KNEW we were ripe for a “male hero” and primed to come down on lunatic women who would support her.
I’m confused how so little of what Jenna discovered was revealed to the public during the trial. And the majority of the public trusted that what was reported was accurate and made their opinions. So either our justice system is failing miserably at getting to the truth and is no longer reliable, or it DID get to the reasonable doubt and the media once again failed us in letting us see why.
Or, it’s exactly as we have seen it to be, and she’s guilty.
I for one am now apprehensive about declaring what justice should be in this case.
Same. It makes me be mad at myself for being so easily swayed to popular opinion, when instead I should be like “Have I been presented ALL the facts?” But the jury has been given more than we have, number one, and I trust Jesus number two. (Or maybe should be vice a versa!)
I am not really interested in this thing, other than reading posts by people I follow, and the odd post substack recommends. I don’t remember even hearing about this when it happened. Did it even make the news back then?
But I just have to say, “Wow!” I started following you when I heard you on Dr. Karin’s podcast and was impressed with the things you said. And this post is further confirmation that I was correct in my assessment.
I have not read a take like this from anyone else, and I admire that you sought out information yourself and weren’t content to receive a pre-packaged narrative.
This was a very interesting post, and I commend you for posting what will surely bother lots of people who expect you to just spout the same talking points.
I appreciate the kind words, Marcy! I really did struggle with posting this, because I KNOW lots of people don't want to consider any other option. I guess they're not my people. :)
Marcy—I like your phrasing of ‘pre-packaged narrative’. We have been fed so many, probably beginning with JFK, that I, for one, am beyond bloated and getting ready for a cleanse. Thank you and thanks to Jenna!
Thanks for this, Jenna.
Things got weird for me when I started siding with the pink-clad AWFLs. I can’t even remember where I read that she confessed, but it goes to show, you can’t trust anyone to tell the untarnished truth. “Do your own research” isn’t limited to the Plandemic!
Yeah, it was the AWFLs that first caused my brain to go sideways. Now I'm asking if it's possible that those nut jobs might be right.
Wasn’t it in the police report? Where they quoted what she said?
Her confession is on page 20 from her civil lawsuit: https://ibb.co/QjfxmFwR
(Full document: https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2026/07/Clancy-Civil-Lawsuit.pdf)
And here is a video of Clancy stipulating to killing her children
https://youtu.be/5lnFKaPJg-M
Here’s a 2024 news article of Clancy pleading insanity
https://www.patriotledger.com/story/news/2024/12/16/lindsay-clancy-patrick-cora-dawson-callan-duxbury-ma-attorney-kevin-reddington/77024269007/
Is the logic Jenna has that it was the defense “strategy” to go this route because they feared they couldn’t prove that she didn’t do it??
Edgar Cayce said that when we die, we feel the feelings of those we loved and those we harmed. Even if this theory is incorrect, it would do us all some good to chew on that thought.
21st century America has become a spiritually vacuous society where too many people do not want to honor the Ten Commandments, one of which is to not murder people (and that’s murder, not kill in self-defense).
Those brain drugs come with warnings that we've all heard, "may cause death."
If there is any lesson to be learned from this very tragic story, is it that we should not trust doctors to first, do no harm: https://lizlasorte.substack.com/p/first-do-no-harm
Damn it Jenna, you’ve dragged me down this rabbit hole.
I’m not really sure why the cops didn’t look into this. However, it appears that the kids were alive when Clancy sent Patrick out to pick up meds and dinner.
If Patrick did it, surely his movements could be (have been) traced, the time of death of all the children estimated and the possibility that he offed them all considered. The evidence (such as it is) doesn’t seem to conform to that timeline. Consider that he either had to commit the murders then go out, come back and then call the cops. Remember that one child died after the EMTs arrived. I don’t think that timeline would make sense.
The other alternative supporting the “Patrick did it” theory would be that he got meds and dinner came back, offed them all and then called the cops. So, the key here is how long between his arrival and the 911 call? Since she allegedly texted him while he was out that would show her alive at the time. Was the text verified?
The theory that seems more reasonable to me it that Clancy had it out for her husband and decided to destroy the family to get back at him.
But, the police should have investigated both parents for the killings.
In any case an absolute tragedy. In my extended family we’ve had our contentious marriages/partnerships. But everyone looks out for the kids and morns the loss of a child. I can’t imagine the evil that led to this situation. I thank God that I can’t. And, I’m glad that I wasn’t on the jury.
Having not your patience for investigation I pushed the claim that Patrick did this into an AI and got this answer:
Patrick’s role and the claim that he killed the family
Patrick testified as a prosecution witness. He described her as a dedicated mother who later spiraled, said he did not understand psychosis at the time, and has publicly framed her as ill rather than evil and said he forgives her. He later sued some of her doctors, alleging negligent treatment contributed to the deaths. He has remarried. Investigators collected his devices as well and reconstructed the evening with video, phones, and communications. He was ruled out as a suspect. 
Online theories (especially on TikTok and X) claim he strangled the children, framed Lindsay, drugged her, or pushed her from the window. Common talking points include DNA on the bands, lack of her fingerprints, a “missing” 15 minutes before he appears on CVS video, later remarriage, and skepticism that a mother would do this. 
Those claims do not hold up against the public record:
• Video places him at two businesses during the only window in which the children could have been killed after he last saw them alive. She answered his call from CVS while he was gone.
• She has repeatedly described herself as the actor to her husband and to multiple clinicians. Her lawyers have not claimed she did not do it.
• Scene reconstruction (blood in the bedroom she occupied, her injuries, her DNA outside, stair data on her devices, children last seen with her) matches her being the only adult in the house.
• Mixed family DNA on household bands plus his handling of the bodies after discovery does not place him at the scene during the killings.
• Drive time, parking, looking for a product, and a short phone call easily account for the interval before he walks into the CVS camera. There is no corroborated “mystery gap” large enough for him to return home, kill three children, stage a suicide attempt, and get to the store on camera.
• No forensic, digital, or witness evidence has been presented that he was home, that he used the bands, or that he inflicted her injuries. Police executed many warrants and reconstructed phones and computers.
A frame-up would require him to leave, return unseen, kill three children with household bands, cut her and throw her from a window in a way that produced her injuries and DNA outside, lock the bedroom, leave again, appear on two stores’ cameras, and have her later consistently confess in ways that match the scene—while her own defense team treats her as the actor. That is not a reasonable reading of the evidence. Disbelief that a mother could do this, anger at gaps in postpartum care, and selective clips of a long trial explain why the theories spread; they are not a substitute for proof. 
The hard remaining question in the case is mental state and criminal responsibility, which is why the jury deadlocked—not who physically killed the children.
All I can say is... click on some of the links. :)
I have to admit that Ai is extremely impressive in situations like this. I still have concerns about it being controlled by nefarious actors, but still....
Sounds like reasonable doubt. Being married to a homicide detective, I can attest that getting a conviction in court is a HUGE win. Husband doesn't pay any attention to these clickbait cases, but I wonder if they did a polygraph on Patrick (not that they hold up in court most of the time).
Polygraph tests are not accurate. I've proven it myself. 😉 I, also, have completely ignored this, and all these types of overblown trials.
Thank you for your deep dive. I think people needed to read this. People tend to believe the headlines in MSM and think it’s fact or the truth. Which is surprising to me considering we selectively don’t generally believe the MSM. Like I had said previously, I had watched most of the trial and came away with exactly the same opinion that you so clearly suggested. My heart breaks for those children and I have too many unanswered questions.