Friday Flashback
To that time when it was almost exactly like it is today
I was looking for something yesterday and stumbled across a post I’d written nearly two and a half years ago about the very first, wholly forced Pfizer data trial dump. I had to recycle it here, because I literally cannot wrap my brain around the fact that this was two and a half years ago, and virtually nothing has changed. If you disagree, you don’t spend nearly enough time on [X].
December 5, 2021 - Every depressing day I see social media posts by people I know—smart people, educated people, people I love and don’t want to suffer or die—bragging about their vaccine status and now, boasting that they’ve been boosted.
They slap that little “I GOT MY SHOT!” frame on their profile photos, which is as catchy as it is self-congratulatory, and certainly more practical from a space-saving perspective than, “GOT MY FOURTH DOSE OF EXPERIMENTAL GENE THERAPY THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO KEEP ME HEALTHY AND PROTECT MY WHOLE COMMUNITY BUT ACTUALLY DOESN’T DO EITHER NEVERTHELESS I’M STILL GOING TO KEEP GETTING IT AND YOU’RE AN ASSHOLE IF YOU DON’T!”
Do they realize that these shots can maim or kill them?
Apparently, they do not. And in their collective, clueless defense, how could they? They’ve already unfriended any former friends (hi!) who were wantonly spreading that dangerous “disinformation,” so most of us (hi!) are out here barking into an echo chamber. Their trusted doctors enthusiastically encourage inoculation, because vaccines are big business and because they could lose their licenses to practice medicine if they don’t. The mainstream news continues to tell them what they want to hear (“safe and effective!”) while burying the irrefutable mountain of evidence to the contrary.
And then you get comments on your posts like this:
“The WHO and other scientific bodies.” I’ll just leave that right there.
Recently [*now nearly three years ago], a group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request demanding the immediate release of the 329,000 pages of data that relate to the FDA approval of the Pfizer vaccine.
It seemed like a fair enough ask: Please show us exactly how you came to that “safe and effective” conclusion. You know, the one you’ve been spouting since day one of the rollout, even though there was zero long-term data on either? The one you’ve used to continually lower the age of injectability down to unborn fetuses (even though women are routinely instructed to avoid sushi and raw sprouts when they’re expecting, but a mysterious chemical cocktail that may or may not alter your DNA gets the unequivocal green light?). The one folks are being forced to take against their will should they wish to work, travel, dine indoors, see Adele in person or snowboard in Vail?
We’d like to see that information, please.
Unfortunately, the attorneys representing the FDA explained, coughing up that data would require them to process 80,000 pages a month, a task that would simply be impossible.
(This is the same info that they allegedly managed to “review” in about five minutes in order to approve first deadly doses for kids and unlimited boosters for all, I’ll point out. But clearly impossible.)
Rather than force such a tedious task on the very busy FDA (“You’re not a horse” didn’t write itself, you know), their clever attorneys asked the judge to allow them to release 500 pages a month, a slick move that would result in the full trial figures being made public in the year 2076, a mere fifty-five years and 660 data dumps away.
I can’t think of a more exciting way to celebrate my 107th birthday!
A motion has been filed to speed that up, but in the meantime the first 500-page batch has dropped, and at the risk of hyperbolizing, it’s a proverbial bombshell.
Take a moment to digest this chart, featuring a breakdown of the results of the 42,086 adverse reactions reported during the “reporting interval,” which was less than three months long.
You’ll notice that the very best-case category, dubbed recovered/recovering, is a bit oxymoronic. If they’re recovering, doesn’t that mean they haven’t quite recovered? You technically can’t be both, so which is it?
Trialist: So how you feeling there, chap?
Participant: Like shit.
Trialist: That’s fantastic! Yesterday it was like death. [checks RECOVERING/RECOVERED on patient chart] You’re all set to go home.
So, thanks to this diligent record keeping, we now know that just under half of all the jab-injured were either fine or not fine at the three-month mark. Helpful! Another 11,361 were definitely not fine, as they “had not recovered at the time of the report.” Just suffering some long-term side-effects, NBD.
Oh, and by the way, 1,223 vaccine recipients died shortly after being poked.
You read that right. One thousand, two hundred twenty-three people who got the Pfizer jab died in the first three months of the program. Mind you, previous “vaccine” rollouts have been scrapped after twenty-five deaths. #TrustTheScience
Also worth noting is the fact that the outcome of 9,400 injured recipients is listed as unknown.
Everyone on the planet: What happened to nearly a quarter of the people who took your safe-and-effective drug in the first three months of administration?
Pfizer: Yeah, we don’t know.
Folks like to flip out any time we “conspiracy theorists” bring up VAERS (“Correlation does not equal causation! Anyone can file a report!”), but this is Pfizer’s own data.
Pfizer: Shit, more than a thousand people have died in less than three months after taking our shots.
Half the planet: Can’t wait to get my eleventy-seventh booster!
If you search for this information online, you’ll notice that shockingly (not), not a single legacy media network covered the Pfizer trial data release. Not one.
Reporter: Boss! Did you hear people are dropping dead after taking the Pfizer jab? But they’re still mandating it? And giving it to kids, who aren’t even at risk of COVID? This is HUGE NEWS! Can I break it? Please?
Editor: Maybe next month. Right now, I’m gonna need you to cover that psychopath who was breastfeeding her cat on a flight from Syracuse to Atlanta.
There were lots of other reactions besides death, of course. You can find a link to the debut data dump here. I want everyone to have this information, because how can you have “informed consent” without it? But folks certainly won’t see it on mainstream news and they probably won’t hear it from me, seeing as lots of them have blocked or unfriended me (for trying to save their lives, call me a little bitter). Maybe you could share?
April 12, 2024 - As you can imagine, I got raked over the coals for this post. And the CDC is still recommending boosters and people are still getting them and if you search for Pfizer Covid trial data release, you won’t find a single legacy media piece since 2021. (A scant few covered the ordering of the release, but none actually touched the data.)
But I’m not going to let that stop me. My job is to comment on stupid things—and from the looks of things, I’m not going to run out of fodder anytime soon.
Speaking as an actual scientist, one who's written papers n stuff, not that this should impress anyone, particularly these days, I can say that I was dumbfounded by the "scientific" dumbfuckery I witnessed.
I recently spoke to a colleague who I'd lost touch with for a few years. This guy has a brain the size of a freakin planet. I have the brainpower of a bowl of porridge in comparison.
We talked a bit about the jab of joy. He said he just trusted what he was told and thought it was all good. He got jabbed. It worked, he said, because the 2nd time he got covid it want as bad as the first.
My jaw hit the floor so fast I think there's still bits of it lying around that I haven't picked up yet.
Science? Pah! That's all so 2019
You’re correct to zero in on that 1223 number, because it’s the only one that matters and is by far, the most shocking. Back in the day, (say around 2019) a post-marketing result of three (3) or more reported deaths would be enough to get the FDA to enforce at least a temporary halt to drug distribution and allow a closer examination of what happened to cause these deaths. The fact that they did nothing and instead tried to bury the data for 75 years is IMO confirmation that yes, they are trying to kill us.