Don't Be a Boob
Ever wondered what baby formula and (so-called) vaccines have in common? I have.
Hi friends and fam! I’m still very busy eating making my way across Italy and enjoying all of its glyphosate-free pasta glorious cultural and architectural treasures, so I’m resurrecting another post you may have missed. This one is a few years old now but it’s an important one, IMO, because it highlights the formula [pun intended] that the media, Big Food/Pharma, and our “health officials” use over and over to push chemical crap on us while usurping natural, clearly superior alternatives. MAHA can’t get into the White House fast enough.
I was nine and my sister Laurie was eleven when we made a gruesome discovery: our parents, it seemed, had had sex. This undeniable fact was revealed to us with the announcement of our mom’s surprise pregnancy. (“It was just the one time,” Laurie and I assured each other. “Probably after that party at the Jordans’. Maybe they were drunk. God, I hope so.”)
Even though my mom was younger with her bonus third baby than I was with my painstakingly planned first, she was prone to moaning about how “old and tired” she was all the time. She liked to sleep in on weekends and babies, it turned out, did not. So, Laurie and I cheerfully signed up for sunrise shifts with our new baby brother.
In addition to other joyful tasks like diaper duty and puke patrol (Brian was born with a “floppy esophagus,” which is the medical term for “some BS condition that makes a baby regurgitate, frequently in a projectile fashion, a minimum of one of every two food molecules he ingests”), Laurie and I became masters at mixing up baby formula.
This was not as simple as it may seem. If you filled the bottle with water and then plopped a scoop of Similac on top, no amount of shaking or stirring could get those two substances to harmoniously comingle. You had to put the in powder first, and then slowly add the water [that you had pre-boiled and partially cooled to the perfect, Goldilocks temperature, a task that took at least an entire episode of Scooby-Doo; sometimes two]. Shaking your concoction at this point filled it with approximately sixteen trillion bubbles, which was a nightmare for babies in general but in particular for floppy esophagus sufferers, so you were advised instead to slowly and gently stir this putrid chemical soup. Sometimes this could be accomplished during a two-minute commercial break, if you had everything assembled in advance.
Twenty-five years later, after a wee struggle rectified with the help of a lactation consultant for only $150, I was nursing my own newborn.
“Why didn’t you breastfeed us?” I asked my mom.
“Oh, you only did that if you couldn’t afford formula,” she explained.
My parents were 19 and 21 when they got married. They did not come from money. Dad was a high school dropout and Mom’s higher education consisted of a year of secretarial school. When my sister and I were born, my parents shared a single clunker of a car and lived with my aunt and uncle. Mom made her own clothes and cut our hair (and not because she was especially gifted with a pair of scissors — see below). I guess it must have escaped her notice that she couldn’t afford formula.
Originally created as a life-saving option for women who were unable to nurse, the infant formula industry seemingly hired the Alan Dershowitz of publicists to portray breastfeeding as a poor mom’s sport and peddle imitation alternatives instead. The campaign was wildly successful, knocking nursing levels down to around 20 percent in the 1950s and 1960s. (I was born in 1969, for reference.) Biology’s most natural act began to regain popularity in the late 1970s; today, thankfully more than 80 percent of U.S. moms nurse their newborns.
The fact that anyone, anywhere, could be convinced that a processed cocktail which may or may not contain artificial sweeteners, emulsifiers, stabilizers, BPA and GMO corn and soy was superior to the convenient, portable, biologically-perfect feeding system Mother Nature thoughtfully built into the female body is both terrifying and mind-blowing. Sure, if a mother dies in childbirth, or has a condition which prevents her from being able to suckle her spawn, or has some reason she needs to be separated from her baby for long stretches, I’m thankful there’s a semi-decent alternative to liquified dinosaur nuggets. But calling any synthetic substitution ‘better than breastmilk’ and framing lactating as shameful is a dangerous and deplorable money-grab by manufacturers that’s been supported by policymakers and lobbyists for decades.
The parallels to natural immunity from infection are patent. “Oh, you had COVID? That’s nice. But we still want you to take this experimental gene therapy that lists death (among hundreds of other debilitating ills) as a side-effect. No, it won’t prevent you from getting sick or spreading the virus to others, but you’re a selfish granny-killer if you refuse it,” insists Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, who raked in more $21 million in the first year of his company’s COVID vaccine rollout. (Also Bourla did not technically say that; that was rhetorical hyperbole, a literary device still protected by freedom of speech.)
I have a degree in advertising and a background in marketing, and I grudgingly give the CDC, FDA, and the Brandon administration props for a frighteningly successful vaccine campaign. You don’t get more than half the country chirping “safe and effective” about an emergency use injectable that has proven itself to be neither without some serious spin and the relentless push of a powerful propaganda machine.
Fortunately, truths are beginning to trickle out. Whistleblowers are stepping out of the shadows and doctors are speaking out about deadly COVID “treatment” protocols and the alarming rise in vaccine injuries and deaths. The most mainstream of media are even reporting that repeated jabs can in fact weaken your immune system—something the spoiler-alertists have been saying all along.
A widely-ignored-by-MSM Israeli study found that “the risk of developing symptomatic COVID-19 was 27 times higher among the vaccinated, and the risk of hospitalization eight times higher [than in those with acquired immunity].” Instead of spreading this hopeful, helpful bit of news, the media collectively decided instead that the horse-dewormer narrative was a far better ratings-booster.
I feel grateful that with the help of the aforementioned lactation consultant, I was able to nurse my babies. Similarly, I’m thankful that I caught and recovered from COVID and have not only all that robust protection but an intact immune system to boot. So you can save your mystery juice for folks who are still buying your hype, and quit wasting your energy, efforts, and incentives trying to get me to roll up my sleeve. There’s not enough free beer, pizza, crinkle cut fries, Krispy Kreme donuts, or Girl Scout cookies on the planet to make me change my mind.
I had my baby in 1972. My best friend at the time had three children, and she breastfed them all, so I just decided that's what I would do. After all, what is easier - all the machinations involved in formula, or just unbuttoning my top. My mother-in-law was aghast. I was not bounteously endowed, so therefore I would starve my baby to death. Ironically, she was so well-endowed that she could not nurse. At the hospital, I had to constantly remind the nurses that I did not want the shot they give you that actually dries up that inconvenient milk. I had a note pinned to my gown. I told my doctor. I was paranoid. There was something else about me having O negative blood, but I forget what. After I gave birth, my baby was whisked away, swaddled like a little mummy, and presented to me for feeding at intervals. He would not nurse, I was frustrated and angry, which did not help. And then one of the nurses/sisters told me she thought the nursery ladies were slipping my baby some sugar water or whatever, so he would not "starve". I made a fuss, and voila!
He was six weeks early, weighed five pounds when I brought him home, but in no time was fat and happy and healthy. My mother-in-law came to visit; she brought a scale so I could weigh my son before and after feeding, which would show me how little food he was getting. FFS, he had those little fat bracelets by then. So nope.
Nursing instead of breastfeeding was actively and almost forcefully discouraged. In 1972. Breastfeeding also reduces the risk of cancer, gives a baby a great start for the immune system, and reduces the occurrence of obesity.
I did not get The Jab, because everything seemed, well, skeevy, red flags, even if only visible to me. I no longer think the medical business is there to help me.
I have a friend who still wears a mask when she flies, has gotten every single booster shot, and has never missed a flu shot in her adult life. She thinks Ivermectin truly is horse medicine and anyone who says otherwise is clearly an unintelligent buffoon. Needless to say, we don't talk about much beyond the weather. Oh wait. We're even losing that topic now too. Because she recently posted something about how anyone that could possibly believe the lines in the sky are anything other than exhaust is clearly losing their minds. So yeah. We don't talk much any more. There's just nothing to talk about.