159 Comments
User's avatar
mike Myhre's avatar

Thank you for speaking on yet another subject that has often been taboo. As always, you have found the humor in it.

I had a dream/nightmare on the subject a few months back. I found myself in court before a judge for using the wrong pronouns on someone. The judge said: "How do you explain your self sir"?

I said: "Did you just address me with the wrong pronouns Judge?"

Judge: "What are your pronouns?"

Me: "Your grace/Your majesty".

Judge: "I didn't now you were born into royalty"

Me: "So how you are born makes a difference?"

Judge: "Excuse me?"

Me: "Please your honor. Address me correctly"

Judge: "Court dismissed"

Expand full comment
Jenna McCarthy's avatar

👏👏👏

Expand full comment
Double Mc's avatar

Also brilliant!

Expand full comment
Carolyn's avatar

Love it

Expand full comment
J. Lincoln's avatar

As the song states, "dreams can come true..."

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

Bravo!!Assuming you are a dude, because I believe if you identify further as a dame, it would be Brava! I’m so confused.

Expand full comment
Anthony S Burkett's avatar

Besides being in a courtroom (I equate my local municipal building as enemy territory), I can't see any nightmarish quality about your dream... it seems more like a fantasy to me. Just say'n ;)

Expand full comment
DeborahLynnPalmer's avatar

Constant Distraction! Go play outside, people. Take our devices and lock them up for 4 days. No tv, No phone, No computer, No candy, No cake. Only grass fed meats, No GMO vegetables, Drink Water. Talk with your children. Listen to your children. Go to their school and visit the teacher and help Students learn to read. Go to church service and listen and pray.

Simple. Simply simple. Your life will change! It’s called Peace!!!

Expand full comment
mike Myhre's avatar

It is interesting how some people just want to be told what to do all the time. They actually don't want free will or their own ideas; it can be scary. Then there are others that never want to be told and if you tell them, they will do the opposite.

Expand full comment
DeborahLynnPalmer's avatar

Socialism can creep in easily with such current distractions. Those who like to be directed are so ripe minded they would follow the directions to line up for the next effort to depopulate. Sorry, I digress… I could rant way too much! Going to go pluck some weeds. Haha

Expand full comment
J. Lincoln's avatar

Of Course! Common sense.

Expand full comment
Graphite's avatar

Amen - preach it sister 🙏👏

Expand full comment
Warrior Mom's avatar

the idea that a human being insists on the rest of us acknowledging either their sexual kink or belief that they are an animal or spirit whatever, in everyday interactions is simply untenable. didn't that used to be called psychopathy? like people got actual treatment for it. hey I'm all for 'you do you' as long as no one is harmed but whatever happened to keeping personal stuff personal? we really do need to draw a line in the sand, as a society.

Expand full comment
Jenna McCarthy's avatar

🎯🎯🎯

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

It’s interesting that when the Pronoun Lords first started instituting them they refused to acknowledge or take serious anyone that did not specify them, and that was deemed acceptable.

Yet when the White House does the same thing, refusing to acknowledge or recognize anyone playing the pronoun game - suddenly this tactic is wrong? The Pronoun Junkies did it first. They can’t handle their own medicine.

At least the principles the White House stance are based on are logical - based on the demonstration that someone is not living in reality or walking in truth. Makes sense. The principles the Pronoun Overlords are based on are narcissistic and psychotic, and chaos inducing.

Expand full comment
Warrior Mom's avatar

a lot of that 'rules for thee and not for me' shit going around. that and the 'inversion' mind game. feels like being in 1st grade again: 'I know you are, so what am I?'

Expand full comment
NJ Kennedy's avatar

...and an old Marxist tactic!

Expand full comment
Tonee norman's avatar

Agreed!

Expand full comment
Donna O's avatar

Yes, like they/them was/were taught correct verb association and/or treated for multiple personality disorder. But now, as the Southern saying goes, “We don’t hide our crazy. We parade it around on the front porch and give it a cocktail!”

Expand full comment
Warrior Mom's avatar

oh man the 'plural pronouns' for one person are about as nuts as they can get. I once heard the excuse for this that went something like: well your language doesn't work for us so we make do. made me wonder - YOUR language?? its all of our language, how about using it correctly.

Expand full comment
NJ Kennedy's avatar

Social media happened and it fed their egos...

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

Scratching me where I itch, Jenna. No, that ain't dirty. If I were hiring for a position, and resumes came in with pronouns listed, those would go into the shredder first. Adios, zee/zirs!

Expand full comment
Jenna McCarthy's avatar

🤣

Expand full comment
Graphite's avatar

Joining the 'unlucky resumes ' in the garbage receptacle- ala 'The Office' with Ricky Gervais?

Expand full comment
KatWarrior's avatar

No one cares about how you identify!

No sane person with a thread of dignity cares one lick about your stupid, insane, fecked up, made-up, childish pronouns.

Now, go back to your cave or safe space and grow up. Put your big girl pants on and start behaving like an adult. Otherwise, please stop taking up valuable space in the world!

Expand full comment
Warrior Mom's avatar

^^ bam!

Expand full comment
Tim Pallies's avatar

For reasons I can't clearly explain, the word "performative" comes to mind. I think what I'm getting at is that the goofy pronoun thing isn't serious--it's about making anyone with a brain feel they are struggling to keep up--or simply to virtue-signal. But that's just the opinion of an aging he/him.

Expand full comment
Maureen's avatar

Well said. Folks can believe whatever they want. They just can’t force me to also believe it.

Expand full comment
djean111's avatar

My sentiments exactly! My grandson says this means I am intolerant. Whatever.

Expand full comment
10ffgrid's avatar

I always laugh when exposed to that nonsense, answered with a "let me know when you want to have an honest conversation." I absolutely refuse to entertain their make-believe alternate universe.

Expand full comment
FREED0ML0VER's avatar

As usual, another great column, Jenna. You are truly a gift to man..er, wom..ah, homo sapienkind.

Expand full comment
Jenna McCarthy's avatar

🤣🤣🤣

Expand full comment
David Nelson's avatar

I am limiting myself to two comments, to give the comments-reading public a needed break.

Firstly, no one asked before inflicting "preferred job titles" on the rest of us. (You can't be an "influencer" because there's no such thing. Ditto "stay-at-home dad.")

Secondly, you unearthed something with your probing article--for which thank you in passing--but didn't expand on: is narcissism a sign of radical liberalism, or equally likely, is radical liberalism a sign of narcissism?

Nelson, out.

[Your temptations to comment further are in vain; I am Rock.]

Expand full comment
Eli's avatar
Apr 15Edited

What an interesting question! (Second comment)

Expand full comment
J. Lincoln's avatar

Don't quit now David, you are onto something.

Expand full comment
Bradley Lewis's avatar

We have to acknowledge narcissism as part of our development-- it's just a matter of that being kept in check as I do think there is "healthy" narcissism in terms of kids needing affirmation/encouragement (to varying degree of course) versus the development of "unhealthy" narcissism that manifests as pure ego and/or excessive self-absorption because of some form of a glaring lack in a person's development. Obviously, this is very general, but it's pretty clear to me that modern existence, and especially our society, feeds and rewards an egocentric and atomistic paradigm over a cooperative and synergistic one.

Expand full comment
10ffgrid's avatar

Confidence vs. narcissism?

Expand full comment
Bradley Lewis's avatar

Certainly takes narcissism to have confidence but think more on an elemental level. Narcissism, at core, is basic self-worth, self-esteem, but at a more fundamental level it's more akin to self-protection & survival. Even at the most basic level our bodies protect against foreign elements-- organ transplants are a problem because the transplant is not "me" and my system will attack it. Just the admittance of foreign proteins into the blood can lead to devastating reactions.

Narcissism shouldn't really have a purely negative connotation because we really cannot function without it. It's just the excessive aspect of self-absorption (Narcissus) that morphs into delusions of grandeur with loss of psychological reality checks that is pathological. I think the insistence of demanding others conform to one's personal wishes (in this case the pronoun fiasco) is largely an overcompensation from those who have lacked, or were previously low on, self-esteem but who have now been emboldened to act out due to a twisted cultural paradigm that has tried to elevate the victim to the status of hero.

Expand full comment
ViaVeritasVita's avatar

In complete agreement. Thank you (from one grammar-lover to another).

Expand full comment
Dena's avatar

It’s also ‘look at me, aren’t I special’, a controlling type of narcissism.

Expand full comment
Jenna McCarthy's avatar

Agree!

Expand full comment
Mary Ann Caton's avatar

Why are so many men, including those who are opposed to the whole idea of transgenderism, willing to say “she” and “her” when speaking of trans women? I ask because I’m troubled over Mark Crispin Miller’s Substack this morning in which he consistently referred to a man who imagines himself to be a woman as “she” and “her.”

Expand full comment
Jim Moore's avatar

Here’s an idea. Respond to any dude pretending to be female who wishes to be addressed as “she/her”with the newly-made-up pronoun “SHER”, as in “SURE, dude, whatever…by the way, your fly is open…”

Expand full comment
Mary Ann Caton's avatar

Or, get them into therapy PDQ. Realty is a good place to live. 😁

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Expand full comment
Jenna McCarthy's avatar

I have no problem with referring to Caitlyn Jenner as she/her… It’s all the neopronouns that make me spin.

Expand full comment
Mary Ann Caton's avatar

I’m curious as to why it doesn’t bother you. Trans women are in reality biologically not women. It’s imaginary, it’s aberrant and has become the pathway for biological men to demand all the rights women have fought for in sports and in privacy. All the clothes and makeup in the world won’t change any guy’s DNA.

Expand full comment
Jenna McCarthy's avatar

Only because it is a pre-existing pronoun. It’s not forcing me to adopt a new language. Do I believe she is an actual woman? No. I guess I’m just choosing my battles here…

Expand full comment
Cindi's avatar

Agree, Mary Ann. A trans “woman” is no different than someone identifying as a dog & wearing muzzle, collar & leash. That person is not a dog & the tranny is not a woman. If we pretend they are, that gives fuel to take over women’s sports.

Expand full comment
Mary Ann Caton's avatar

This conversation started on Jeff Childer's Substack this morning after one reader told this old joke: two professors were sitting next to each other on a flight to the U.S., an American and a Soviet. The American asked the Soviet why he was coming to America. He answered that he was coming here to study American propaganda. And the American professor said, "What propaganda?" The irony of it for me was that even Mark Crispin Miller, whom I have always regarded as our premier expert on propaganda, didn't see that he was caught up in that net that the old joke above refers to.

Expand full comment
Cindi's avatar

I saw that on C&C too

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

It’s much trickier when the person is your own grandkid. Ask how I know?

Expand full comment
Carrey's avatar

Or a woman’s DNA trying to be a man.

Expand full comment
Jim Moore's avatar

Disagree. Sorry (not sorry…stealing from you). Not that I’ll ever have to address him (pretty sure we’ll never cross paths), but to me Jenner remains the real man he was when appearing on the Wheaties box in ‘78. What he is today, um, I see him as a Col. Maxwell Q. Klinger caricature.

I cannot think of one good reason to reinforce someone’s destructive fantasy by participating in their charade.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/1978-flashback-bruce-jenner-wheaties-and-the-117171767386.html

https://mash.fandom.com/wiki/Maxwell_Q._Klinger

Expand full comment
NJ Kennedy's avatar

...and the blasphemy (for me at least. I believe God created us male and female and that is a good thing) - like the Almighty screwed up somehow.

Expand full comment
MaryAnn's avatar

100% Agree! God does not make mistakes.

Expand full comment
Cathie's avatar

He will always be Bruce to me. I never buy into another's delusional. Nothing could ever make me do it.

Expand full comment
Roberta Stack's avatar

I don’t give it any thought and I don’t play the pronoun game. Just seems so stupid to me.

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

Not related to pronouns, BUT my heart goes out to the cats that decided to own ladies (and gentlemen) who can't stand the smell of tuna fish. Yikes!

Expand full comment
Jenna McCarthy's avatar

😹

Expand full comment
Evelyne's avatar

Don’t feel too terribly bad, Steve! My feline has me completely wrapped around her tail and turns her nose away from tuna…she’d rather have SALMON! (I didn’t have her for her first 14 years!)

Expand full comment
Double Mc's avatar

That.Was.Brilliant.

Expand full comment
Jenna McCarthy's avatar

😊

Expand full comment