Those millions of Americans who suffered under Jim Crow and segregation are either dead or in nursing homes at this point. And segregation was not practiced in every corner of America, either. At my junior year prom, the queen was the whitest white girl you can imagine, while the prom king was black. They slow-danced together and no one rioted, burned down the town, or marched in protest. That was 1964. So, sorry not sorry, AOC.
Opposite my graduation in 1974. I even remember their names but all I’ll say the Queen was black and the King was white and our class was colorblind. I was proud of what we as a country were becoming and I’m sorry I’ve lost that pride. I hope all of the will restore it before I die but I’m not optimistic.
There are always exceptions to comments meant as broad generalizations. Nonetheless it’s probably accurate to say that there is no one alive who lived through Jim Crow, a 19th century phenomenon.
It is true that Charlie Kirk brought pain to millions of Americans, not great pain but some pain, because sometimes "it hurts to have to think when you don't want to."
The tide is going out and "The Fifty-Eight" standing high and dry are the core, the bedrock, of The, dying, Bigotry Industry.
I’m sooooo over listening to anything that twats like AOC have to say, that I barely* even read articles about her anymore, and I refuse to watch videos of her that will waste precious minutes of my life and leave me feeling dumber for the mistake of doing so.
(*except for yours, Jenna, which I know will be entertaining despite the undeserving subject)
Me too. I mute and disappear her whenever she soils my ears or eyes. Lots of the left is receiving my opinion. BUT I prayed for my voice to not remain silent by my own cowardice. Surprisingly, that has started to happen in little ways. Christ promised that the words would be supplied. Just open your mouth. This is the true battle now—between good and evil. I see God has given us a push and head start in this very dangerous time. It should be very clear now.
I am driving, so I will have to wait to read the article. Just based on the headline alone that’s disgusting… But also our entire government has chosen not to honor him by putting forward yet another official lie in regards to his death.. We as Citizens have been forced to accept the official story for more than a century when there is never any evidence to support it. There is only ever evidence to support the contrary. Since the day of his assassination, I have had to watch Charlie die what is pretty close to probably 1000 times. I have spoken to dozens of people that I regard as highly intelligent and not one of them myself included sees any plausible way that the official story is credible. As an understatement, I have shot tens of thousands of rounds from every imaginable Caliber weapon and I am intimately familiar with what most of them will do in any given scenario. If Charlie’s body managed to stop that projectile as we are told, his body would’ve been thrown through the tent behind him.. full stop. Charlie was shot with a small bore rifle from the right side And what we all saw was the exit wound. The entry has now been illustrated by a number of people from a couple different angles by going frame to frame. Furthermore, there has been some extremely elaborate work done with the acoustics(all matching) From multiple video sources that illustrate the shot was much closer than 200 yards. You are being lied to again. Also, F AOC.
Thanks for tackling the difficult topics, and if possible, finding a drop of humor (or two) to bring levity.
People (and especially leaders) need to evolve, or ultimately they die off. Whether it be the stump they preach from or the life they live, without evolution (just like viruses) they'll hit the ultimate dead end.
I believe Charlie Kirk was (within the last 6 months) in front of a crossroads, that being sidestepping genocide or adhering to the $$ that supported his platform/goals.
He was evolving, maturing, challenging dogma, and praying for clarity and the best path forward.
I believe he pivoted (evolved) and it became precarious, difficult, and sometimes impossible to keep his talisman in front of him vs. continuing to stay the course of days long since passed.
I believe there is more to this loss of life, as horrible as it is.
We as citizens lack the required honest clarity as to exactly what happened from our (FBI, really?) investigators and therefore government.
Why, not dissimilar to 9/11, was there a rush to wipe clean the location of the shooting and cement over the place of his final platform?
Where's the bullet(s), forensics, autopsy, witness testimony from those present, video captured by others in the audience (smell a rat yet)??
I too need to keep reading, questioning, learning, evolving.
I do not know, but there is no genocide occurring in Gaza (I assumed that was what you meant, but you were not specific), and 80% of Gazans support Hamas' murderous activities of October 7th, so even if he did, he would have been 80% correct. Remember that Gazans voted Hamas into power.
Also know that there is Gaza and the West Bank, which is run by the PLO, and both are considered "Palestine", so your question has an inaccurate basis as is your use of the word "genocide" for what is going on in "Gaza" (again, not all of Palestine.) Facts matter, and getting facts correct is important.
"I have stayed out of the Charlie Kirk event and avoided looking too closely at the multitude of theories about what exactly happened on 10th September 2025. I took on board some good advice from my colleague William Briggs who writes the Science is Not the Answer substack1.
I could now post an amazing piece of click-bait along the lines that “Charlie Kirk’s life insurance policy due to pay out tens of millions disappears just three days before his death!” and include the “absolutely explosive” evidence below that his company GGLF 2023 which held a life insurance policy likely worth tens of millions “disappeared” on 7th September 2025."
I am not going to link my video from this morning because we are all here to bask in the greatness of the world’s best author; but if you know who I am go watch it on instagram.
How about being shot a “close range” with a small caliber weapon? Not from hundreds of yards away. And where’s the bullet? And what did the autopsy reveal? The results that have never been published. And the whole things was “case closed” in a matter of a few days. And they didn’t preserve the crime scene. The school poured concrete over the platform he was standing on. So many holes in the narrative.
Dude, Methinks thou doth protest too much. Did I mention his wounds at all? Did I question the idea of a different perpetrator or gun? No, all I did was challenge this one sentence in your comment “If Charlie’s body managed to stop that projectile as we are told, his body would’ve been thrown through the tent behind him.. full stop.” Yet you obviously sidestepped-that. If you are trying to convince people, it’s best not to use hyperbolic assertions that have been disproved by physics. I’m sure I could find the mathematical equations for you or you could just watch an episode of Mythbusters.
While I don’t doubt you have fired tens of thousands of rifle rounds, my assumption is that none of those have been fired into living people, so I’m wondering where your contention that “If Charlie’s body managed to stop that projectile as we are told, his body would’ve been thrown through the tent behind him—full stop.” I think you’re ignoring Newton’s Third Law of Motion, if it would have blown Kirk backward through the tent, it would also knock the shooter down with equal and opposite momentum, which doesn’t happen. The bullet’s velocity, when it hits the target, is lower than when it leaves the muzzle — so the momentum imparted to the target is less than the recoil momentum experienced by the shooter, and it’s the momentum transfer that determines how much an object can be moved, so that portion of your argument does not comport with physics.
Clearly, you don’t know how the firearm works in the first place. Clearly, you have no experience or knowledge of any ballistic tests gel or otherwise. The 30.06 has been around for over a century,1906 to be exact, long used because of its devastating effects. it has been used in two world wars and has taken millions of animals over the past century on this continent and others. The exit wound would’ve been the back of his head and half of his neck. I hunt deer with a slower lighter round because the 30.06 Always leaves a giant crater on exit. Go do a google image search for “30.06 exit wound”….
Impact at 200 yards is still significant enough to defeat almost all body armor, the meat,(not bone) of a man’s neck CANNOT stop this projectile. An average of 1500 ft lbs at 200 yards distributed by an object.308 inches in diameter is a lot. Trying to stop it from traveling 2400 fps to 0 with 4-5 inches of meat isn’t a thing. His head slumped towards the reported direction of the entry point…also not a thing.
Here’s Google misunderstanding my question but getting the point. “”The phrase "1500 ft lbs" is a measurement of energy, not force, and an impact of that magnitude would not simply knock someone over—it would be catastrophic. For context, a 9mm handgun round delivers about 400 ft lbs of energy, while a .357 Magnum can reach nearly 600 ft lbs. An impact of 1500 ft lbs is equivalent to or even exceeds the muzzle energy of an AK-47. “
As Jimmy Failla said one time, "AOC is where Jasmine Crockett goes to feel smart." To say she is as stupid as a box of rocks is to insult the rocks. She is the poster child of the stupidity carrying the water for the Demoncrats.
What this assassination accomplished, well beyond any expectations, was to expose the contrast between the right and the liberal progressive left. The left has been revealed to be heartless, disgraceful, belligerent, unhinged, despicable and psychopathic. I could argue that every Democrat would have voted against honoring Charlie Kirk, but they are already up against the wall politically and yet another bad decision such as rejecting common decency would have been the end for the party.
JUst read the newsweek article -- it was surprisingly fair. And it's also surprising that one of the MSM rags would "out" those who didn't vote for the resolution. I will call my reps who voted against and let them know they are an embarrassment.
I see my last Dem rep voted against. She was redistricted out to a more Demwit friendly shithole here in Illinois. Lauren Underwood, who championed health care for all the people and the rest of the crap she weaseled around about. have a GOP now. Sadly, another cold heart Sean Casten, (Illinois, again) who should know intimately about the utter grief and loss of a close family member, when his 17 year old daughter went to bed one night and never woke up, soon after her Covid jab in 2021. Doctors were baffled. That is never mentioned, but a strong case could probably be made that she was murdered as well. He’s the one I may remind that having a sense of someone’s even basic humanity is important if they are in a seat of power. How could he forget that. Sad, isn’t it?
Update: Lauren Underwood is on the Newsweek list of voting NO. Casten is on that list as not voting at all but the remark I made still stands.
Thinking about our degenerate congress honoring Charlie Kirk, I couldn't help but think of Lincoln's Gettysburg address.
". . . But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate-we can not consecrate-we can not hallow-this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract."
Charlie was so much better than most of them, that their recognition of him means little in my mind. Does he deserve it? Of course. But honestly he deserves so much more.
AOC is an absolute idiot. Not quite sure how she got elected, because her brains sure aren't the reason.
And Charlie Kirk was an incredible man, someone I felt the loss of personally, swiftly and still. I'm saddened by some of the response by the people on the left. And sickened.
She got elected because she was young, fit the identity requirements & knew how to use social media to her benefit. I don’t much about her district, but I imagine it is mostly uninformed progressive democrats.
I don’t listen to AOC at all, mute the TV when I see her. I watched the memorial yesterday and was so moved by everyone’s tribute. I didn’t know much about Charlie prior to last week. He certainly knew how to speak to people’s hearts and minds. He was “once in a generation”kind of person and he surrounded himself with some amazing people. His spirit and cause will live on and for that I am grateful.
Turned on the laptop a few minutes ago; it was still set to Firefox (well,it is my husband's laptop) and the screen opened with the "Counsel" to the DNC, some female, who told "me" that she/the DNC has/have just sued DJT for whatever and she wants my (viewer) money. This-- right after the Kirk Memorial service. I wonder if the Demoncrats cobbled together that ad just last night, in terror, after his service. Yesterday afternoon I opened the show on three different channels just to do my little part in upping the algorithm re viewership--then went out to the gardens, not to miss the warmth and sunshine on the last day of summer. Hmm, his service was held on the final day of summer......
The Democrat ticket for 2028 could easily be AOC/Mandami. The Left always overplays its hand. Non brainwashed Americans are not only done with the Democratic Party, they are at War with the Democratic Party. As JD said, “we have it from here”.
Can someone put out a list of the 58 who voted against the resolution? A clever meme form would come in handy I’m sure… finances need to be closely looked at to find out who is paying for them to be openly ignorant. Then, they need to be voted out. How do they get elected in the first place????
Ilhan Omar has supposedly gone from a net worth in the tens of thousands to tens of millions in the short time she has been in congress. That needs to be investigated. If the investigation reveals that laws were broken then penalties need to be applied. We are tired of elected people getting rich off backroom deals to sell out our wealth and freedom.
I believe they get rich off our actual tax dollars that were funneled in such a way (via NSAID/NGOs) that they ended up in the pockets of those trying to dismantle our country, who then pay for the fealty of thugs like AOC and Ilhan. So when I see thousands turn into millions in 3-4 short years, I see the theft of our income tax.
Somalis are know grifters. It’s how they survive in the shithole of that East African country. Bribes, theft, lies, etc. They bring that way of living back here. No excuse. Having it handed to them without all that work, must be have them laughing their arses off. Send her back. On a rubber dinghy.
They can do that with ANY politician, and should!!!! The wealth politicians accumulate is not in proportion to their salaries. There are never consequences.
Here's the list of those who Voted "No" (58, all Democrats) on "H.Res. 719" (“Honoring the life and legacy of Charles ‘Charlie’ James Kirk”), per the official roll call:
California (4)
• Sydney Kamlager-Dove
• Jimmy Gomez
• Davida Simon
• Maxine Waters
Florida (4)
• Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick
• Maxwell Frost
• Frederica Wilson
• (note: Debbie Wasserman Schultz voted Yes, not in this group)
Georgia (4)
• Hank Johnson
• Lucy McBath
• Nikema Williams
• Sanford Bishop
Illinois (6)
• Danny K. Davis
• Jonathan Jackson
• Raja Krishnamoorthi
• Robin Kelly
• Delia Ramirez
• Mike Quigley
Louisiana (2)
• Troy Carter
• Troy Fields
Maryland (2)
• Kweisi Mfume
• Glenn Ivey
Massachusetts (3)
• Seth Moulton
• Ayanna Pressley
• (plus Jim McGovern voted Yes, so only 2 in No group here)
Michigan (3)
• Rashida Tlaib
• Shri Thanedar
• (Debbie Dingell voted Yes)
Minnesota (1)
• Ilhan Omar
Missouri (2)
• Emanuel Cleaver
• Cori Bush’s successor Yoli Bell
New Jersey (2)
• Rob Menendez
• Bonnie Watson Coleman
New York (3)
• Adriano Espaillat
• Yvette Clarke
• Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
North Carolina (1)
• Valerie Foushee
Nevada (1)
• Steven Horsford
Ohio (2)
• Joyce Beatty
• Emilia Sykes
Pennsylvania (1)
• Summer Lee
Rhode Island (1)
• Gabe Amo
South Carolina (1)
• Jim Clyburn
Texas (3)
• Sylvia R. Garcia
• Al Green
• Veronica Escobar
Virginia (1)
• Bobby Scott
Washington (2)
• Pramila Jayapal
• Marilyn Strickland
Wisconsin (1)
• Gwen Moore
Connecticut (1)
• Jahana Hayes
Alabama (2)
• Terri Sewell
• Shomari Figures
Voted Present (2)
• Greg Casar (TX)
• Jamaal Bowman (NY)
Not Voting (6)
• Katie Porter (CA)
• Raul Grijalva (AZ)
• Mark Takano (CA)
• Donald Payne Jr. (NJ)
• Melanie Stansbury (NM)
• Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC Delegate)
Source: official House roll call (Roll Call 282, Sept. 19, 2025)
Just a note: Raul Grijalva (D- AZ) is dead, died March of this year. AZ will be voting for his replacement this term. Unfortunately, his daughter is running for his seat. Ugh.
Those millions of Americans who suffered under Jim Crow and segregation are either dead or in nursing homes at this point. And segregation was not practiced in every corner of America, either. At my junior year prom, the queen was the whitest white girl you can imagine, while the prom king was black. They slow-danced together and no one rioted, burned down the town, or marched in protest. That was 1964. So, sorry not sorry, AOC.
AOC's dream is a divided and conquered America and she is trying her best to make that happen.
And to replace it with authoritarian governance.
Precisely. She is busy doing the will of her masters; those who placed her into power.
She’s also dumb.
Opposite my graduation in 1974. I even remember their names but all I’ll say the Queen was black and the King was white and our class was colorblind. I was proud of what we as a country were becoming and I’m sorry I’ve lost that pride. I hope all of the will restore it before I die but I’m not optimistic.
You were obviously not in Kentucky in1963 our school’s first integrated I’m not in a nursing home yet graduated in 1964
There are always exceptions to comments meant as broad generalizations. Nonetheless it’s probably accurate to say that there is no one alive who lived through Jim Crow, a 19th century phenomenon.
It is true that Charlie Kirk brought pain to millions of Americans, not great pain but some pain, because sometimes "it hurts to have to think when you don't want to."
The tide is going out and "The Fifty-Eight" standing high and dry are the core, the bedrock, of The, dying, Bigotry Industry.
Yes, sometimes I get headaches when I think about liberals like AOC
I’m sooooo over listening to anything that twats like AOC have to say, that I barely* even read articles about her anymore, and I refuse to watch videos of her that will waste precious minutes of my life and leave me feeling dumber for the mistake of doing so.
(*except for yours, Jenna, which I know will be entertaining despite the undeserving subject)
Me too. I mute and disappear her whenever she soils my ears or eyes. Lots of the left is receiving my opinion. BUT I prayed for my voice to not remain silent by my own cowardice. Surprisingly, that has started to happen in little ways. Christ promised that the words would be supplied. Just open your mouth. This is the true battle now—between good and evil. I see God has given us a push and head start in this very dangerous time. It should be very clear now.
Well said Janet. Something we (I) need to do. Pray for my voice not to remain silent by my own cowardice or fear.
Same!!
I am driving, so I will have to wait to read the article. Just based on the headline alone that’s disgusting… But also our entire government has chosen not to honor him by putting forward yet another official lie in regards to his death.. We as Citizens have been forced to accept the official story for more than a century when there is never any evidence to support it. There is only ever evidence to support the contrary. Since the day of his assassination, I have had to watch Charlie die what is pretty close to probably 1000 times. I have spoken to dozens of people that I regard as highly intelligent and not one of them myself included sees any plausible way that the official story is credible. As an understatement, I have shot tens of thousands of rounds from every imaginable Caliber weapon and I am intimately familiar with what most of them will do in any given scenario. If Charlie’s body managed to stop that projectile as we are told, his body would’ve been thrown through the tent behind him.. full stop. Charlie was shot with a small bore rifle from the right side And what we all saw was the exit wound. The entry has now been illustrated by a number of people from a couple different angles by going frame to frame. Furthermore, there has been some extremely elaborate work done with the acoustics(all matching) From multiple video sources that illustrate the shot was much closer than 200 yards. You are being lied to again. Also, F AOC.
This is my theory as well!
Jenna,
Thanks for tackling the difficult topics, and if possible, finding a drop of humor (or two) to bring levity.
People (and especially leaders) need to evolve, or ultimately they die off. Whether it be the stump they preach from or the life they live, without evolution (just like viruses) they'll hit the ultimate dead end.
I believe Charlie Kirk was (within the last 6 months) in front of a crossroads, that being sidestepping genocide or adhering to the $$ that supported his platform/goals.
He was evolving, maturing, challenging dogma, and praying for clarity and the best path forward.
I believe he pivoted (evolved) and it became precarious, difficult, and sometimes impossible to keep his talisman in front of him vs. continuing to stay the course of days long since passed.
I believe there is more to this loss of life, as horrible as it is.
We as citizens lack the required honest clarity as to exactly what happened from our (FBI, really?) investigators and therefore government.
Why, not dissimilar to 9/11, was there a rush to wipe clean the location of the shooting and cement over the place of his final platform?
Where's the bullet(s), forensics, autopsy, witness testimony from those present, video captured by others in the audience (smell a rat yet)??
I too need to keep reading, questioning, learning, evolving.
MADHAVA SETTY, MD
https://madhavasetty.substack.com/p/how-do-we-know-what-i-s-r-e-a-l
took a nice go at this in his posting above.
Like many have said, we may be at the beginning of an ending dogma and evolving into a new reality.
Charlie Kirk, RIP
He never supported genocide.
Point taken.
I continue to learn.
Is it fair to say he originally associated Hamas with all Palestinians?
I do not know, but there is no genocide occurring in Gaza (I assumed that was what you meant, but you were not specific), and 80% of Gazans support Hamas' murderous activities of October 7th, so even if he did, he would have been 80% correct. Remember that Gazans voted Hamas into power.
Also know that there is Gaza and the West Bank, which is run by the PLO, and both are considered "Palestine", so your question has an inaccurate basis as is your use of the word "genocide" for what is going on in "Gaza" (again, not all of Palestine.) Facts matter, and getting facts correct is important.
As always, more food for thought:
https://thinkingcoalition.substack.com/p/charlie-kirks-life-insurance
Writer Alex Kriel:
"I have stayed out of the Charlie Kirk event and avoided looking too closely at the multitude of theories about what exactly happened on 10th September 2025. I took on board some good advice from my colleague William Briggs who writes the Science is Not the Answer substack1.
I could now post an amazing piece of click-bait along the lines that “Charlie Kirk’s life insurance policy due to pay out tens of millions disappears just three days before his death!” and include the “absolutely explosive” evidence below that his company GGLF 2023 which held a life insurance policy likely worth tens of millions “disappeared” on 7th September 2025."
Read on to enjoy the fun.
Best
Wow, so that's where all the tinfoil went.
😁
🤣🤣🤣
It's easy to see when someone has only ever viewed 'edited' snippets of Kirk and not his full videos.
Folks, anytime you think "AOC is right", you need to shake it off, dive back in and figure out where you went wrong.
I am not going to link my video from this morning because we are all here to bask in the greatness of the world’s best author; but if you know who I am go watch it on instagram.
I don’t know who you are but I would be interested to see what you have. I am on IG. What is your username or could you provide a link?
Some things just don’t add up.
Please link it.
I don't use IG but if it's on X, I'll watch.
I don’t use x.
Thank you, Marc! We are owed the effing truth, but likely won’t ever see the light of day.
And yah, feck you, AOC! Take your stupidity, nastiness and your PR ass back to a bar where you rightfully belong!
BTW, I am working on “ love the sinner, hate the sin!”
Maybe you should let Trump, J.D. and Kash know about this? Or are they all in on the cover-up already?
How about being shot a “close range” with a small caliber weapon? Not from hundreds of yards away. And where’s the bullet? And what did the autopsy reveal? The results that have never been published. And the whole things was “case closed” in a matter of a few days. And they didn’t preserve the crime scene. The school poured concrete over the platform he was standing on. So many holes in the narrative.
I agree. Very interesting theory around BB’s involvement with Charlie Kirk.
Dude, Methinks thou doth protest too much. Did I mention his wounds at all? Did I question the idea of a different perpetrator or gun? No, all I did was challenge this one sentence in your comment “If Charlie’s body managed to stop that projectile as we are told, his body would’ve been thrown through the tent behind him.. full stop.” Yet you obviously sidestepped-that. If you are trying to convince people, it’s best not to use hyperbolic assertions that have been disproved by physics. I’m sure I could find the mathematical equations for you or you could just watch an episode of Mythbusters.
Amen.
While I don’t doubt you have fired tens of thousands of rifle rounds, my assumption is that none of those have been fired into living people, so I’m wondering where your contention that “If Charlie’s body managed to stop that projectile as we are told, his body would’ve been thrown through the tent behind him—full stop.” I think you’re ignoring Newton’s Third Law of Motion, if it would have blown Kirk backward through the tent, it would also knock the shooter down with equal and opposite momentum, which doesn’t happen. The bullet’s velocity, when it hits the target, is lower than when it leaves the muzzle — so the momentum imparted to the target is less than the recoil momentum experienced by the shooter, and it’s the momentum transfer that determines how much an object can be moved, so that portion of your argument does not comport with physics.
Clearly, you don’t know how the firearm works in the first place. Clearly, you have no experience or knowledge of any ballistic tests gel or otherwise. The 30.06 has been around for over a century,1906 to be exact, long used because of its devastating effects. it has been used in two world wars and has taken millions of animals over the past century on this continent and others. The exit wound would’ve been the back of his head and half of his neck. I hunt deer with a slower lighter round because the 30.06 Always leaves a giant crater on exit. Go do a google image search for “30.06 exit wound”….
Impact at 200 yards is still significant enough to defeat almost all body armor, the meat,(not bone) of a man’s neck CANNOT stop this projectile. An average of 1500 ft lbs at 200 yards distributed by an object.308 inches in diameter is a lot. Trying to stop it from traveling 2400 fps to 0 with 4-5 inches of meat isn’t a thing. His head slumped towards the reported direction of the entry point…also not a thing.
Here’s Google misunderstanding my question but getting the point. “”The phrase "1500 ft lbs" is a measurement of energy, not force, and an impact of that magnitude would not simply knock someone over—it would be catastrophic. For context, a 9mm handgun round delivers about 400 ft lbs of energy, while a .357 Magnum can reach nearly 600 ft lbs. An impact of 1500 ft lbs is equivalent to or even exceeds the muzzle energy of an AK-47. “
Ak shoots 7.62x39; pale in comparison to 30.06
As Jimmy Failla said one time, "AOC is where Jasmine Crockett goes to feel smart." To say she is as stupid as a box of rocks is to insult the rocks. She is the poster child of the stupidity carrying the water for the Demoncrats.
Good one!
What this assassination accomplished, well beyond any expectations, was to expose the contrast between the right and the liberal progressive left. The left has been revealed to be heartless, disgraceful, belligerent, unhinged, despicable and psychopathic. I could argue that every Democrat would have voted against honoring Charlie Kirk, but they are already up against the wall politically and yet another bad decision such as rejecting common decency would have been the end for the party.
Full display now.
Maybe I should sue AOC for violating my freedom of speech because her stupidity frequently leaves me speechless.
😂
Here’s the complete list of Democrats who voted against honoring Charlie, those who voted “present” (an act of Roberts Rules cowardice), and those who did not vote at all: https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-kirk-resolution-house-vote-democrats-list-2132640
JUst read the newsweek article -- it was surprisingly fair. And it's also surprising that one of the MSM rags would "out" those who didn't vote for the resolution. I will call my reps who voted against and let them know they are an embarrassment.
I see my last Dem rep voted against. She was redistricted out to a more Demwit friendly shithole here in Illinois. Lauren Underwood, who championed health care for all the people and the rest of the crap she weaseled around about. have a GOP now. Sadly, another cold heart Sean Casten, (Illinois, again) who should know intimately about the utter grief and loss of a close family member, when his 17 year old daughter went to bed one night and never woke up, soon after her Covid jab in 2021. Doctors were baffled. That is never mentioned, but a strong case could probably be made that she was murdered as well. He’s the one I may remind that having a sense of someone’s even basic humanity is important if they are in a seat of power. How could he forget that. Sad, isn’t it?
Update: Lauren Underwood is on the Newsweek list of voting NO. Casten is on that list as not voting at all but the remark I made still stands.
Not voting is just as cowardly as voting “present “.
Indeed
Thinking about our degenerate congress honoring Charlie Kirk, I couldn't help but think of Lincoln's Gettysburg address.
". . . But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate-we can not consecrate-we can not hallow-this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract."
Charlie was so much better than most of them, that their recognition of him means little in my mind. Does he deserve it? Of course. But honestly he deserves so much more.
He'll be receiving the highest honor that a civilian can receive, According to the POTUS.
AOC is an absolute idiot. Not quite sure how she got elected, because her brains sure aren't the reason.
And Charlie Kirk was an incredible man, someone I felt the loss of personally, swiftly and still. I'm saddened by some of the response by the people on the left. And sickened.
She got elected because she was young, fit the identity requirements & knew how to use social media to her benefit. I don’t much about her district, but I imagine it is mostly uninformed progressive democrats.
I don’t listen to AOC at all, mute the TV when I see her. I watched the memorial yesterday and was so moved by everyone’s tribute. I didn’t know much about Charlie prior to last week. He certainly knew how to speak to people’s hearts and minds. He was “once in a generation”kind of person and he surrounded himself with some amazing people. His spirit and cause will live on and for that I am grateful.
Turned on the laptop a few minutes ago; it was still set to Firefox (well,it is my husband's laptop) and the screen opened with the "Counsel" to the DNC, some female, who told "me" that she/the DNC has/have just sued DJT for whatever and she wants my (viewer) money. This-- right after the Kirk Memorial service. I wonder if the Demoncrats cobbled together that ad just last night, in terror, after his service. Yesterday afternoon I opened the show on three different channels just to do my little part in upping the algorithm re viewership--then went out to the gardens, not to miss the warmth and sunshine on the last day of summer. Hmm, his service was held on the final day of summer......
The Democrat ticket for 2028 could easily be AOC/Mandami. The Left always overplays its hand. Non brainwashed Americans are not only done with the Democratic Party, they are at War with the Democratic Party. As JD said, “we have it from here”.
That AOC and Mandami are even in politics is an example of what a hermetically sealed bubble of self-important delusion NYC really is.
AOC and any media that promotes her destructive stupidity and vile personality is one with darkness, with evil.
Can someone put out a list of the 58 who voted against the resolution? A clever meme form would come in handy I’m sure… finances need to be closely looked at to find out who is paying for them to be openly ignorant. Then, they need to be voted out. How do they get elected in the first place????
Ilhan Omar has supposedly gone from a net worth in the tens of thousands to tens of millions in the short time she has been in congress. That needs to be investigated. If the investigation reveals that laws were broken then penalties need to be applied. We are tired of elected people getting rich off backroom deals to sell out our wealth and freedom.
I believe they get rich off our actual tax dollars that were funneled in such a way (via NSAID/NGOs) that they ended up in the pockets of those trying to dismantle our country, who then pay for the fealty of thugs like AOC and Ilhan. So when I see thousands turn into millions in 3-4 short years, I see the theft of our income tax.
Somalis are know grifters. It’s how they survive in the shithole of that East African country. Bribes, theft, lies, etc. They bring that way of living back here. No excuse. Having it handed to them without all that work, must be have them laughing their arses off. Send her back. On a rubber dinghy.
They have what they need to boot Omar out of congress, except the balls to do it.
They can do that with ANY politician, and should!!!! The wealth politicians accumulate is not in proportion to their salaries. There are never consequences.
Not sure it’s even money. They are spiritually lost to the dark side. They ARE dark hearted. But, yes I would like them gone from my congress.
There are two in the thread thus far
You can check any congressional vote online.
Another commenter posted a link with the names of who voted no. Here it is:
https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-kirk-resolution-house-vote-democrats-list-2132640
Thank you!
Scroll up. Stephen did.
Soros $
Here's the list of those who Voted "No" (58, all Democrats) on "H.Res. 719" (“Honoring the life and legacy of Charles ‘Charlie’ James Kirk”), per the official roll call:
California (4)
• Sydney Kamlager-Dove
• Jimmy Gomez
• Davida Simon
• Maxine Waters
Florida (4)
• Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick
• Maxwell Frost
• Frederica Wilson
• (note: Debbie Wasserman Schultz voted Yes, not in this group)
Georgia (4)
• Hank Johnson
• Lucy McBath
• Nikema Williams
• Sanford Bishop
Illinois (6)
• Danny K. Davis
• Jonathan Jackson
• Raja Krishnamoorthi
• Robin Kelly
• Delia Ramirez
• Mike Quigley
Louisiana (2)
• Troy Carter
• Troy Fields
Maryland (2)
• Kweisi Mfume
• Glenn Ivey
Massachusetts (3)
• Seth Moulton
• Ayanna Pressley
• (plus Jim McGovern voted Yes, so only 2 in No group here)
Michigan (3)
• Rashida Tlaib
• Shri Thanedar
• (Debbie Dingell voted Yes)
Minnesota (1)
• Ilhan Omar
Missouri (2)
• Emanuel Cleaver
• Cori Bush’s successor Yoli Bell
New Jersey (2)
• Rob Menendez
• Bonnie Watson Coleman
New York (3)
• Adriano Espaillat
• Yvette Clarke
• Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
North Carolina (1)
• Valerie Foushee
Nevada (1)
• Steven Horsford
Ohio (2)
• Joyce Beatty
• Emilia Sykes
Pennsylvania (1)
• Summer Lee
Rhode Island (1)
• Gabe Amo
South Carolina (1)
• Jim Clyburn
Texas (3)
• Sylvia R. Garcia
• Al Green
• Veronica Escobar
Virginia (1)
• Bobby Scott
Washington (2)
• Pramila Jayapal
• Marilyn Strickland
Wisconsin (1)
• Gwen Moore
Connecticut (1)
• Jahana Hayes
Alabama (2)
• Terri Sewell
• Shomari Figures
Voted Present (2)
• Greg Casar (TX)
• Jamaal Bowman (NY)
Not Voting (6)
• Katie Porter (CA)
• Raul Grijalva (AZ)
• Mark Takano (CA)
• Donald Payne Jr. (NJ)
• Melanie Stansbury (NM)
• Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC Delegate)
Source: official House roll call (Roll Call 282, Sept. 19, 2025)
It would be a real shame if this list were to go viral. ✂️ *cuts and pastes
Just a note: Raul Grijalva (D- AZ) is dead, died March of this year. AZ will be voting for his replacement this term. Unfortunately, his daughter is running for his seat. Ugh.